Med-El loses UK appeal in Advanced Bionics fight

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Med-El loses UK appeal in Advanced Bionics fight

Entrance to the Royal Court of Justice

The Court of Appeal had stern words for Med-El’s representatives after they highlighted a deputy judge’s background as a solicitor

Hearing implant maker Med-El lost an appeal in its patent fight with Advanced Bionics at the England and Wales Court of Appeal today, May 24.

Lady Justice Kathryn Thirlwall, who handed down the judgment, also had sharp words for Med-El’s representatives over a reference to a deputy High Court judge’s background as a solicitor.

Med-El had challenged the High Court’s decision, issued by Mr Justice Campbell Forsyth in June 2022, to invalidate one of its patents covering cochlear implants.

Arguments began yesterday, May 23, and finished this morning.

The court, which dismissed Med-El’s appeal in full, handed down its verdict this afternoon.

Thirlwall heard the appeal alongside Lord Justices Richard Arnold and Colin Birss.

The full judgment has yet to be published, but Managing IP attended a virtual hand down.

According to Med-El’s counsel, Forsyth made an error in finding the patent obvious over a piece of prior art.

The prior art in question was another patent covering the design of cochlear implants and referred to as ‘Zimmerling’.

Sharp rebuke

At the end of proceedings, Thirlwall criticised Med-El’s representatives over how they referred to Forsyth in their skeleton argument.

The document referred to Forsyth’s job as a partner at Mishcon de Reya and noted that he was appointed to sit as a deputy High Court judge in late 2021.

Thirlwall said these details were irrelevant and “raised eyebrows” among the judges.

“Those matters shouldn’t have been in the skeleton argument.

“It’s no more appealing to do that than to say it was a very strong court,” she told Adrian Speck KC, who argued for Med-El.

Speck said the brief was only meant to identify the judge.

But Thirlwall replied: “His name would have done, and we had that on the judgment.

“I wouldn’t expect to see that sort of observation made in anyone’s skeletons before this court.”

In its own skeleton, Advanced Bionics criticised Med-El for highlighting Forsyth’s training as a solicitor.

“They could also have pointed out that he is a patent specialist of many years’ standing,” the Advanced Bionics brief said.

Solicitor judges are rare in England and Wales, where most High Court judges are former barristers.

An EPO board of appeal upheld an amended version of Med-El’s patent last September.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

In other news, Ericsson sought a declaratory judgment against Acer and Netflix filed a cease-and-desist letter against ByteDance over AI misuse
As trade secret filings rise due to AI development and economic espionage concerns, firms are relying on proactive counselling to help clients navigate disputes
IP firm leaders share why they remain positive in the face of falling patent applications from US filers, and how they are meeting a rising demand from China
The power of DEI to swing IP pitches is welcome, but why does it have to be left so late?
Mathew Lucas has joined Pearce IP after spending more than 25 years at Qantm IP-owned firm Davies Collison Cave
Exclusive survey data reveals a generally lax in-house attitude towards DEI, but pitches have been known to turn on a final diversity question
Managing IP will host a ceremony in London on May 1 to reveal the winners
Abigail Wise shares her unusual pathway into the profession, from failing A-levels to becoming Lewis Silkin’s first female IP partner
There are some impressive AI tools available for trademark lawyers, but law firm leaders say humans can still outthink the bots
Lawyers at Simmons & Simmons look ahead to a UK Supreme Court hearing in which the court will consider whether English courts can determine FRAND terms when the licence is offered by an intermediary rather than an SEP owner
Gift this article