Med-El loses UK appeal in Advanced Bionics fight

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Med-El loses UK appeal in Advanced Bionics fight

Entrance to the Royal Court of Justice

The Court of Appeal had stern words for Med-El’s representatives after they highlighted a deputy judge’s background as a solicitor

Hearing implant maker Med-El lost an appeal in its patent fight with Advanced Bionics at the England and Wales Court of Appeal today, May 24.

Lady Justice Kathryn Thirlwall, who handed down the judgment, also had sharp words for Med-El’s representatives over a reference to a deputy High Court judge’s background as a solicitor.

Med-El had challenged the High Court’s decision, issued by Mr Justice Campbell Forsyth in June 2022, to invalidate one of its patents covering cochlear implants.

Arguments began yesterday, May 23, and finished this morning.

The court, which dismissed Med-El’s appeal in full, handed down its verdict this afternoon.

Thirlwall heard the appeal alongside Lord Justices Richard Arnold and Colin Birss.

The full judgment has yet to be published, but Managing IP attended a virtual hand down.

According to Med-El’s counsel, Forsyth made an error in finding the patent obvious over a piece of prior art.

The prior art in question was another patent covering the design of cochlear implants and referred to as ‘Zimmerling’.

Sharp rebuke

At the end of proceedings, Thirlwall criticised Med-El’s representatives over how they referred to Forsyth in their skeleton argument.

The document referred to Forsyth’s job as a partner at Mishcon de Reya and noted that he was appointed to sit as a deputy High Court judge in late 2021.

Thirlwall said these details were irrelevant and “raised eyebrows” among the judges.

“Those matters shouldn’t have been in the skeleton argument.

“It’s no more appealing to do that than to say it was a very strong court,” she told Adrian Speck KC, who argued for Med-El.

Speck said the brief was only meant to identify the judge.

But Thirlwall replied: “His name would have done, and we had that on the judgment.

“I wouldn’t expect to see that sort of observation made in anyone’s skeletons before this court.”

In its own skeleton, Advanced Bionics criticised Med-El for highlighting Forsyth’s training as a solicitor.

“They could also have pointed out that he is a patent specialist of many years’ standing,” the Advanced Bionics brief said.

Solicitor judges are rare in England and Wales, where most High Court judges are former barristers.

An EPO board of appeal upheld an amended version of Med-El’s patent last September.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Jinwon Chun discusses the need for vigilance, his love for iced coffee, and preparing for INTA
Karl Barnfather’s new patent practice will focus on protecting and enforcing tech innovations in the electronics, AI, and software industries
Partner Ranjini Acharya explains how her Federal Circuit debut resulted in her convincing the court to rule that machine learning technology was not patent-eligible
Paul Hastings and Smart & Biggar also won multiple awards, while Baker McKenzie picked up a significant prize
Burford Capital study finds that in-house lawyers have become more likely to monetise patents, but that their IP portfolios are still underutilised
Robert Reading and Faidon Zisis at Clarivate unpick some of the data surrounding music-related trademarks
China's latest IP litigation statistics and a high-profile hire by O'Melveny were also among the top talking points this week
David Aylen, who spent more than 20 years at Gowling WLG, has joined United Trademark and Patent Services as of counsel in the UAE
Europe is among the most lucrative legal markets for PE firms to bet on, but clients’ reactions will decide whether external investment drives success
Rulings of note covered pre-June 2023 infringements and jurisdiction over non-UPC states, while winners of Managing IP’s EMEA Awards acted in multiple cases
Gift this article