Med-El loses UK appeal in Advanced Bionics fight

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Med-El loses UK appeal in Advanced Bionics fight

Entrance to the Royal Court of Justice

The Court of Appeal had stern words for Med-El’s representatives after they highlighted a deputy judge’s background as a solicitor

Hearing implant maker Med-El lost an appeal in its patent fight with Advanced Bionics at the England and Wales Court of Appeal today, May 24.

Lady Justice Kathryn Thirlwall, who handed down the judgment, also had sharp words for Med-El’s representatives over a reference to a deputy High Court judge’s background as a solicitor.

Med-El had challenged the High Court’s decision, issued by Mr Justice Campbell Forsyth in June 2022, to invalidate one of its patents covering cochlear implants.

Arguments began yesterday, May 23, and finished this morning.

The court, which dismissed Med-El’s appeal in full, handed down its verdict this afternoon.

Thirlwall heard the appeal alongside Lord Justices Richard Arnold and Colin Birss.

The full judgment has yet to be published, but Managing IP attended a virtual hand down.

According to Med-El’s counsel, Forsyth made an error in finding the patent obvious over a piece of prior art.

The prior art in question was another patent covering the design of cochlear implants and referred to as ‘Zimmerling’.

Sharp rebuke

At the end of proceedings, Thirlwall criticised Med-El’s representatives over how they referred to Forsyth in their skeleton argument.

The document referred to Forsyth’s job as a partner at Mishcon de Reya and noted that he was appointed to sit as a deputy High Court judge in late 2021.

Thirlwall said these details were irrelevant and “raised eyebrows” among the judges.

“Those matters shouldn’t have been in the skeleton argument.

“It’s no more appealing to do that than to say it was a very strong court,” she told Adrian Speck KC, who argued for Med-El.

Speck said the brief was only meant to identify the judge.

But Thirlwall replied: “His name would have done, and we had that on the judgment.

“I wouldn’t expect to see that sort of observation made in anyone’s skeletons before this court.”

In its own skeleton, Advanced Bionics criticised Med-El for highlighting Forsyth’s training as a solicitor.

“They could also have pointed out that he is a patent specialist of many years’ standing,” the Advanced Bionics brief said.

Solicitor judges are rare in England and Wales, where most High Court judges are former barristers.

An EPO board of appeal upheld an amended version of Med-El’s patent last September.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

In other news, Australia’s IP office has announced expanded search options, and an EPO report shed light on slow progress relating to women inventors in Europe
Managing IP speaks with up-and-coming women lawyers at five law firms about fighting imposter syndrome, maintaining work-life balance and why real representation matters
Kilpatrick’s managing partner for San Francisco discusses taking the longer route to partnership, the importance of female mentors, and strengthening office culture
Home-working and grace periods at IP offices have been announced, while Managing IP understands Iran’s IP office is out of service
With INTA 2026 just two months away, London-based IP practitioners offer tips on making the most out of the city
New platform, which covers SEPs for the Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 7 standards, includes 10 patent owners
The Texas-based IP litigation hires take King & Spalding’s partner appointments from pre-merger Winston & Strawn up to 12 this year
Sunny Su explains how her team overcame challenges with orchard evidence collection to secure a favourable plant variety decision from China’s top court
Flexible working firm continues trajectory from 2025 with appointment of Matthew Grant and Letao Qin
Anousha Davies, associate and trademark attorney at Birketts, unpicks how the university’s reputation enabled it to see off a proposed trademark for ‘Cambridge Rowing’
Gift this article