India’s IPAB sets aside revocation of Pfizer's sunitinib patent
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India’s IPAB sets aside revocation of Pfizer's sunitinib patent

The Patent Controller’s failure to forward a crucial piece of evidence to the Opposition Board resulted in injustice, ruled the IPAB

Spicy IP reports that the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) has set aside the Patent Controller’s revocation of Pfizer’s sunitinib cancer drug. At issue was the Controller’s failure to forward to the Opposition Board an expert affidavit from one of Pfizer's experts. Pfizer argued that the affidavit contained crucial information in response to evidence presented by opposing experts.

The IPAB’s ruling sets the stage for a third ruling on the sunitinib patent. The Patent Controller most recently revoked the patent back in February, and last October made a similar finding after domestic generic manufacturer Cipla filed a post-grant opposition to the patent (patent number IN209251). An appeal to the Supreme Court reinstated the patent with orders for the Controller to rehear the matter.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers weigh in on the USPTO’s request for comment on the effects of AI on prior art analysis and obviousness determinations
A vast majority of corporates – especially smaller businesses – rely on a trusted referral when instructing external counsel, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The Munich Regional Court ruled that Lenovo was an unwilling licensee and had engaged in ‘holdout’ tactics
Technological innovation should play a critical role in advancing sustainable practices, argues Justin Delfino, global head of IP and R&D at Evalueserve
Ewan Grist of Bird & Bird, who acted for Lidl in its trademark victory against Tesco, reveals some of the lessons brand owners can take from the judgment
Dolby’s lawsuit at the Delhi High Court follows a record win by Ericsson earlier this year against the same defendant
Tee Tan, chief information officer at the owner of several IP firms, says to avoid tech just for the sake of it and explains how his company builds in-house tools
Regardless of whether the FTC’s ban on non-competes goes into effect, businesses should stop relying on these agreements
Mary Till, a former legal advisor at the USPTO who has joined Finnegan this week, is looking forward to providing clients with a USPTO perspective
Gift this article