Google gets Motorola go-ahead, plus a warning

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Google gets Motorola go-ahead, plus a warning

The EU’s antitrust regulator has told Google it can go ahead with its plan to buy Motorola Mobility, which develops smartphones and tablet computers, saying it would not “significantly modify” the market for operating systems and patents for these devices

Joaquín Almunia, the EU’s competition commissioner, said on Monday that the $12.5 billion deal does not raise competition issues. But he added that the Commission will continue to “keep a close eye” on the behaviour of all market players in the sector, particularly in the increasingly strategic use of patents.


The Commission said it had analysed a number of factors as part of its assessment of the deal, including whether it would significantly change the existing market situation when it comes to the ability of makers of smartphones to access standards-essential patents.


It also considered whether Google would be in a position to use Motorola’s standard-essential patents to obtain preferential treatment for its services, including search and advertising. The Commission concluded that Google already had many ways in which to incentivise customers to take up its services and that buying Motorola would not materially change this.


The Commission is already examining the way that telecoms companies deploy their patents in disputes with rivals. At the end of last month, it opened a formal investigation into whether Samsung Electronics breached EU competition law by enforcing standard-essential patents for 3G technology.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Gift this article