Google gets Motorola go-ahead, plus a warning

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Google gets Motorola go-ahead, plus a warning

The EU’s antitrust regulator has told Google it can go ahead with its plan to buy Motorola Mobility, which develops smartphones and tablet computers, saying it would not “significantly modify” the market for operating systems and patents for these devices

Joaquín Almunia, the EU’s competition commissioner, said on Monday that the $12.5 billion deal does not raise competition issues. But he added that the Commission will continue to “keep a close eye” on the behaviour of all market players in the sector, particularly in the increasingly strategic use of patents.


The Commission said it had analysed a number of factors as part of its assessment of the deal, including whether it would significantly change the existing market situation when it comes to the ability of makers of smartphones to access standards-essential patents.


It also considered whether Google would be in a position to use Motorola’s standard-essential patents to obtain preferential treatment for its services, including search and advertising. The Commission concluded that Google already had many ways in which to incentivise customers to take up its services and that buying Motorola would not materially change this.


The Commission is already examining the way that telecoms companies deploy their patents in disputes with rivals. At the end of last month, it opened a formal investigation into whether Samsung Electronics breached EU competition law by enforcing standard-essential patents for 3G technology.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The decision marks a rare grant of a request under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act in a patent case
Stobbs has applied to strike out a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
With trademark volumes surging, trademark teams need to think beyond traditional clearance searches, towards a continuous, intelligence-led workflow, says Meghan Medeiros of Corsearch
Brazilian in-house counsel say law firms’ technology investments have not translated into tangible benefits, meaning tech use is a minor factor when selecting advisers
A lack of comfort among some salaried partners shows why law firms must actively foster inclusion, not merely focus on diversity mandates
Arrival of Laura Alonso, alongside a team of 11, will bring ‘significant value’ to ECIJA clients, says CEO
In the first of a two-part article, lawyers at Spruson & Ferguson and Marshall Gerstein provide an overview of China’s system for appealing against patent invalidation decisions
Lawyers and corporate leaders at INTA’s Business of M&A conference in New York discussed how cross-practice collaboration and early in-house involvement can help deals
Lily Li, partner at Morrison Foerster, shares how her litigation team helped secure victory at the ITC in a patent infringement case
Top talking points also included news of an appellate ruling concerning ‘Pisco’ and Indian drugmakers gearing up to launch generic versions of Ozempic as Novo Nordisk’s patent expires
Gift this article