Timeline: how your gTLD application will progress

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Timeline: how your gTLD application will progress

After Icann finally opened the application stage for new gTLDs today, Managing IP explains the lifecycle of a gTLD application and the hurdles it may have to jump

March

Applicants must register a slot in Icann’s TLD Application System before March 29 2012.

April

Applicants have until April 12 to submit their applications.

Icann will check that all applications are complete before publishing the list of strings by April 27.

May

Both a public comment period and Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) early warning period open for 60 days.

A seven-month objection period opens. Objections can be filed on four grounds: legal rights; community; string confusion; limited public interest.

The GAC can also ask Icann to block a gTLD if members feel it could be sensitive in their countries or violate their laws.

June

An initial evaluation process opens where a team of evaluators assesses each gTLD and carries out background screening checks on applicants. This process is expected to last five months but if applications exceed 500 then Icann will place applications into batches. Processing applications that are not in the first batch will therefore take longer than five months.

November

Applications that pass initial evaluation will be ready for pre-delegation testing; applications that fail this initial stage can enter extended evaluation, where panels may reject some applications.

January/February 2013

If applications pass initial evaluation, are in the first batch, do not receive any formal objections and pass pre-delegation testing, then they will be ready to launch and their registries will open.

There are many permutations in this process, especially if there are auctions, dispute resolution procedures and discussions with the GAC. Icann says complex applications may not receive the go-ahead until 2014.

But the most straightforward applications should be in the root by January or February 2013 – a year and a half after the Icann board voted in favour of the gTLD programme.

Later in 2013

After all the applications have been processed, there will be three reviews of the system. Once these are completed, Icann will launch a second round of applications.

See also: Icann offers olive branch to needy applicants and Politicians win power to block gTLDs.

How many gTLD applications do you predict? Vote in our poll on our homepage.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

While Sipara will continue operating under its existing name and leadership for now, both firms plan to present a united front at the INTA Annual Meeting in London
Sheppard has added quantum and robotics expertise to its AI industry team to help clients navigate questions around inventorship and IP infringement
The 2026 Americas ceremony recognised outstanding firms and practitioners, along with highlighting impact cases of the year
A development concerning Stephen Thaler’s AI copyright application in India and an integration between IPH group firms were also among the top talking points
As concerns around the little-known litigation tool increase, practitioners say they are educating their clients on how it can be most effective
Kilburn & Strode and Mewburn Ellis are just two firms that have invested heavily in office space – a sign that the legal industry is serious about in-person working
In major recent developments, Dyson snagged another win against Hong Kong-based competitor Dreame and a new AI-powered UPC platform was launched
Mohit and Sidhant Goel decided not to pursue an interim injunction application so that their client, Communications Components Antenna, could benefit from a fast-track trial
Anita Cade, head of Ashurst’s IP and media team in Australia, discusses why law firms that can pull together capability across different practice areas and jurisdictions stand to gain
INTA’s CEO says London-based firms have registered fewer delegates compared to past meetings in San Diego and Atlanta, and questions the 'ethics' of trying to participate without registering
Gift this article