Liberalising the EU’s software market

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Liberalising the EU’s software market

Case of the Year: UsedSoft v Oracle

brand.jpg

The result

Software licences can be resold

The impact

The possibility of a sophisticated market for pre-used software licences

A ruling from Europe's highest court in July should make it easier for people who have more software than they need to sell it people wanting extra. That's good news for software users but less good for program-writing companies.

The Court of Justice of the EU ruled on July 3 in a dispute between software reseller UsedSoft and technology company Oracle. It said that customers of software resellers who buy an updated user licence may download the software from the copyright owner's website.

UsedSoft clients that do not already possess the software download it from Oracle's website after acquiring a so-called used licence. Clients who already have the software can buy another licence for additional users or to receive software updates. They then download the software to the main memory of the computers of those new users.

Oracle objected to the resale practice and asked the German courts to order UsedSoft to stop. Germany's Federal Court of Justice asked the Court of Justice of the EU to interpret the directive on the legal protection of computer programs.

The ruling from Europe's top court means that an author of software cannot prevent the resale of a pre-used licence allowing the use of his programs to be downloaded from the internet. In particular, the exclusive right of distribution of a copy of a computer program covered by the licence is deemed to be exhausted on its first sale.

Even if the licence agreement bans a further transfer, the IP owner cannot oppose the resale of the copy or to copies of the program that are later updated by the software author.


Conor Ward, partner at Hogan Lovells, says the decision could have profound effects on the software industry. In the subdued economic climate, many companies have a surplus of software licences as they lay off workers: "It is likely that a market for pre-used software licences could develop fairly rapidly.

But software companies such as Oracle can take some comfort from the Court's ruling. The judges said that if Oracle's customers buy a licence that allows them to provide the software to more users than need it, the customer cannot then divide the licence and resell only part of it.

In addition, any Oracle customer that sells his licence must then make the software downloaded onto his own computer unusable.

Ultimately of course, any ruling on technology is in danger of being superseded by developments in the sector. In this case, Flemming Moos of Norton Rose in Hamburg says that technical measures may undermine the potential impact of the ruling. "In Germany the Federal Court of Justice has decided that software manufacturers may protect their software by technical means such as product activation mechanisms that link a software program to a certain user, so that the software can only be used by the respective user and resales are hindered by technical means," he says. If that ruling is upheld, software manufacturers could enforce their interests using technical measures. Another option would be for them to provide software over the internet through the so-called cloud.

Now that UsedSoft has liberalised the EU software resale market, there will be pressure for the US to free up its own resale market. Watch out for similar fights on the other side of the Atlantic.

Case details

UsedSoft v Oracle

Technology: Software

Copyright owner: Oracle

Other party involved: Usedsoft

Courts: Court of Justice of the EU following a referral from Germany's Federal Court of Justice

For UsedSoft: Meisterernst Rechtsanwälte

For Oracle: TCI Rechtsanwalte


This case was selected as one of Managing IP’s Cases of the Year for 2012.

To see the rest, click on one of the cases below.

The 10 cases of the year

A fillip for the EU pharmaceutical sector

Relief for trade mark owners in red sole saga

Australian TV streaming service held to be illegal

Smartphone war hits front page in the US

Liberalising the EU’s software market

India allows parallel imports

Victory for fair dealing in Canada

Lacoste loses its trade mark in China

Google prevails in Android attack

EU test case clarifies class headings

Ten you might have missed

Canada: Ambiguous claims can invalidate patents

Russia: Certainty on parallel imports

Italy: TV formats win copyright for the first time

First FRAND cases litigated worldwide

Monsanto loses in Brazil

Data exclusivity backed by Mexican courts

China: A shift over OEM manufacturing

Authors in the US able to reclaim joint copyrights

Germany: Knitted trainers a sign of the future

India: Financial Times loses trade mark

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm explains how it secured a $170.6 million verdict against the government in a patent dispute surrounding airport technology, and why the case led to interest from other inventors
Developments of note included the court partially allowing a claim concerning confidentiality clubs and a decision involving technology used in football matches
The firm said adding capability in the French capital completes its coverage of all major patent litigation jurisdictions as it strives for UPC excellence
Marc Fenster explains how keeping the jury focused on the most relevant facts helped secure a $279m win for his client against Samsung
Clients are divided on what externally funded IP firms bring to the table, so those firms must prove why the benefits outweigh the downsides
Rahul Bhartiya, AI coordinator at the EUIPO, discusses the office’s strategy, collaboration with other IP offices, and getting rid of routine tasks
A boom in transactional work and a heightened awareness of IP have helped boost revenue for the rebranded commercial services team
Clemens Heusch, head of global litigation and dispute resolution at Nokia, tells us why open conversations – and respectful challenges – lead to the best results
Siegmund Gutman, who joined Mintz one year ago, explains the firm’s approach to life sciences litigation and what it means for hiring plans
The merger of two IP boutiques could prompt others to follow suit and challenge Australia’s externally funded firms
Gift this article