Facebook feels users’ wrath over Instagram terms of service
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Facebook feels users’ wrath over Instagram terms of service

Facebook’s fleeting decision to change Instagram’s terms of service yesterday highlights the fine line in social media between sound business policies and PR nightmares

“Legally, the scope of the rights that a company has in user and/or user-generated content depends on the grant of rights provisions in its Terms of Service,” said Michael Kasdan of Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein. This means that companies must spell out clearly what their rights are for users in order to guarantee maximum monetisation of the site’s content.

Under Facebook’s proposed model for Instagram yesterday, a third-party company could pay Facebook for images it may want to use, but Facebook is under no obligation to compensate the user, said Kasdan. “Notably, there is no opt-out provision; the choice for a user is either to use Instagram and give up these rights, or to use another service,” he added.

Instagram competitors like Flickr mobile have taken a different approach, requiring the express permission of the user before sharing photos with third parties, and sharing compensation with the user. 

Angry users, including Mark Zuckerberg’s wedding photographer, immediately voiced their concerns on Instagram yesterday.

“Ultimately, the market will decide” if this is a sound business decision for Facebook, said Kasdan following the announcement. “What we are seeing right now is a very strong and negative reaction among the user-base.”

Today, Instagram responded to the market’s concerns by backtracking on the changes, promising to “fix any mistakes, and eliminate the confusion”.

Kevin Systrom, co-founder of Instagram, continued in his blog post: “As we review your feedback and stories in the press, we’re going to modify specific parts of the terms to make it more clear what will happen with your photos.”

Systrom also said the site will remove the language about using users’ photos in ads.“We do not have plans for anything like this and because of that we’re going to remove the language that raised the question,” he wrote. 

"The market has spoken," said Kasdan. "And [Facebook is] listening."

For more tips on writing effective Terms of Service provisions, see Kasdan's and Charles Macedo's July article on the topic for Managing IP.



more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

On day one of the EUIPO’s Case Law Conference, delegates heard why single-letter trademarks are weak and received an update on the EU’s design law shakeup
High-earning businesses place most value on the depth of the external legal teams advising them, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Kilpatrick Townsend was recognised as Americas firm of the year, while patent powerhouse James Haley won a lifetime achievement award
Partners at Foley Hoag and Kilburn & Strode explore how US and UK courts have addressed questions of AI and inventorship
In-house lawyers have considerable influence over law firms’ actions, so they must use that power to push their external advisers to adopt sustainable practices
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Counsel say they’re advising clients to keep a close eye on confidentiality agreements after the FTC voted to ban non-competes
Data from Managing IP+’s Talent Tracker shows US firms making major swoops for IP teams, while South Korea has also been a buoyant market
The finalists for the 13th annual awards have been announced
Counsel reveal how a proposal to create separate briefings for discretionary denials at the USPTO could affect their PTAB strategies
Gift this article