Revealed: Chinese companies’ IP strategies
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Revealed: Chinese companies’ IP strategies

cover-puff.jpg

Managing IP’s biggest ever survey of Chinese in-house counsel reveals their IP filing plans, experience with litigation and policies on hiring foreign firms. Peter Leung spoke to ZTE, JK Sucralose, Livzon Pharmaceutical and other respondents to get the details

How much do you expect your foreign filing budget to grow next year?

null

null

The 2012 Chinese in-house survey was conducted at Managing IP's third IP Forum for Chinese IP counsel in Beijing, which was attended by more than 400 companies. The results underscore the increase in Chinese outbound work, revealing much about the types of companies making the move overseas and how they manage their IP portfolios. Four out of five of the 130 respondents said their budget for protecting IP rights abroad had increased in the past year, with some saying it had more than doubled (see chart, above).

There is no single profile that fits the Chinese companies looking to expand overseas; they come from a wide variety of industries and they structure their IP in a range of ways. However, the data and subsequent interviews do reveal some common themes.

Chinese businesses contemplating overseas expansion are cautious and diligent in the way they manage their IP. What sets them apart from peers in more developed economies is a particularly strong emphasis on the need for preventative measures and research that allows them to anticipate problems and minimise litigation risks. Chinese companies also seek external counsel who understand their business goals, and that the legal work is just one part of a larger strategy.

Analysis of the results of the survey, the raw data and case studies with companies ZTE and JK Sucralose are available at the links below. The first is free to access but you must be a subscriber to see the data and the case studies.

As ever, there is discussion of the results on the Managing IP Twitter account. Use the hash tag #MIPChinaSurvey. Please tell us your opinion on China and its IP either there or using the comment button at the top of this story.

We are also preparing the survey for next year, which will be used at the 2013 Beijing and Shanghai events. If there are any questions you think would be interesting to add to the survey, please email us at mip@managingip.com. Anyone suggesting a question will receive free access to the sections of the survey otherwise only available to subscribers. 

China in-house survey contents

1. Introduction and methodology

2. Analysis: aggressive expansion, cautious IP

3. Case study: Alex An, JK Sucralose on winning at the ITC

4. Case study: Alvin Shen, ZTE on managing its IP abroad

5. The data:


more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

With a team of more than 80 patent lawyers and attorneys across 21 European offices, the firm is acting in some of the most high-profile UPC cases
Lippes Mathias has hired three partners and a counsel from Offit Kurman
External counsel for automotive companies explain how trends such as AI and vehicle connectivity are affecting their practices and reveal what their clients are prioritising
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The winners of the awards will be revealed at a gala dinner in New York City on April 25
Counsel debate the potential outcome of SCOTUS’s latest copyright case after justices questioned whether they should dismiss it
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career
The small Düsseldorf firm is making a big impact in the UPC. Founding partner Christof Augenstein explains why
The court criticised Oppo’s attempts to delay proceedings and imposed a penalty, adding that the Chinese company may need to pay more if the trial isn’t concluded this year
Miguel Hernandez explains how he secured victory for baby care company Naterra in his first oral argument before the Federal Circuit
Gift this article