Cybersquatting cases on the rise, says WIPO

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cybersquatting cases on the rise, says WIPO

A record number of brand owners filed cybersquatting cases with WIPO last year – and the IP organisation says that the introduction of new gTLDs will stretch trade mark owners’ resources still further

WIPO says that its Arbitration and Mediation Center received 2,764 UDRP cases covering 4,781 domain names last year, up 2.5% on 2010.

In 2011 the top five areas of WIPO complainant activity were retail; internet and IT; biotechnology and pharmaceuticals; fashion; and banking and finance.

Of the gTLD cases filed with WIPO in 2011, more than three-quarters related to .com registrations. Applying UDRP jurisprudence, panels in 2011 found evidence of cybersquatting in 88% of all cases.

At the end of last year, the WIPO Center received the first UDRP case concerning a domain name in the new .xxx domain.

Francis Gurry, WIPO’s director-general, said that the trends mean that brand owners already have to make difficult choices for their stretched online enforcement resources.

“With the domain name coordinating body, ICANN, allowing for a massive increase in the number of new domains, brand owners’ resources will likely be stretched further,” he added.

WIPO has proposed that ICANN introduce so-called pre- and post-delegation procedures for new gTLD registries. It expects that the first pre-delegation cases could be filed by trade mark owners against domain applicants within the next few months. The WIPO Center is making available party resources for this new procedure.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Niall Trainor, managing attorney at Hasbro, says brands could boost their business with careful portfolio culling
A decision by the Paris Central Division will lead to more IP work for outside counsel, say sources
Courts are encouraged to deliver judgments within three months of a trial, but that deadline has been missed in several recent cases
Lawyers at Maiwald and Sterne Kessler analyse how patents with claims directed to medical treatments are handled in the US and in Europe
Michael DeVincenzo explains how he and his team convinced the Federal Circuit to find in favour of his client in a patent case against Salesforce
Funders and a litigator explain how litigation funding disclosure requirements could affect their business
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Discussions about whether to seek director reviews can come up frequently with clients, even though actual grant rates are rare
In the latest episode, we discuss why IP firms might be attractive to PE investors and bring you the latest news on submissions for next year’s IP STARS rankings
Back-to-back PE deals for IP firms in recent years show that IP firms are sitting on goldmines, so traditional partnerships should be open to change
Gift this article