Spain: Historical reputation versus lack of use
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Spain: Historical reputation versus lack of use

Even James Bond can boast about having ridden on one. Hispano – Suiza was one of the world references of luxury and competition cars at the beginning of the 20th century and was affected by the Spanish Civil War – not being able to relaunch in the market despite its fame.

But this trade mark is still very present and it is back in the news. There has been a curious legal dispute over who is the owner of the trade mark and the Spanish Supreme Court has just resolved it after 70 years.

The founder's descendants have kept the trade mark under their ownership but focused on other markets, such as displaying old models or making miniature replicas. Therefore, they tried to prevent a company from registering the trade mark for manufactured automobiles, establishing that the action was looking for an appropriation of the reputation of the previous trade mark. But on February 8 2017, the decision was published and it established that they have lost exclusivity due to lack of use. The Supreme Court recognised that "the reputation associated with the 'Hispano-Suiza' sign is essentially historical, without a real link to the actual company".

In the different instances, it has been established that even though Hispano-Suiza is a well-known trade mark in the Spanish territory, it is not because of the use of the trade name Hispano Suiza, Automobile Factory, SA, but only because of the memory of the legendary cars, which stopped being manufactured more than 80 years ago.

Time has established that the lack of manufacturing activity, repair and sale of vehicles under the mark in question has caused the loss of the trade mark registrations and trade names in certain markets.

The sentences have decreed that there is no use of prestige or reputation that can associate the business activities developed by the heirs of the original trade mark with the activity that originates the entire real case.

In this case, the question is if the historical reputation of a trade mark is enough to cover different business activities even if it no longer develops the main activity that gave the brand its distinction. At present, the legislation is clear in regards to the loss of trade mark rights for lack of use: no use means you cannot live from the past.

Ramón Moreda

PONS IPGlorieta Rubén Darío, 428010 – Madrid SpainTel: +34 917007600Fax: +34

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

External counsel for automotive companies explain how trends such as AI and vehicle connectivity are affecting their practices and reveal what their clients are prioritising
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The winners of the awards will be revealed at a gala dinner in New York City on April 25
Counsel debate the potential outcome of SCOTUS’s latest copyright case after justices questioned whether they should dismiss it
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career
The small Düsseldorf firm is making a big impact in the UPC. Founding partner Christof Augenstein explains why
The court criticised Oppo’s attempts to delay proceedings and imposed a penalty, adding that the Chinese company may need to pay more if the trial isn’t concluded this year
Miguel Hernandez explains how he secured victory for baby care company Naterra in his first oral argument before the Federal Circuit
The UPC judges are wrong – restricting access to court documents, and making parties appoint a lawyer only to have a chance of seeing them, is madness
The group, which includes the Volkswagen, Seat and Audi brands, is now licensed to use SEPs owned by more than 60 patent owners
Gift this article