Spain: Historical reputation versus lack of use

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Spain: Historical reputation versus lack of use

Even James Bond can boast about having ridden on one. Hispano – Suiza was one of the world references of luxury and competition cars at the beginning of the 20th century and was affected by the Spanish Civil War – not being able to relaunch in the market despite its fame.

But this trade mark is still very present and it is back in the news. There has been a curious legal dispute over who is the owner of the trade mark and the Spanish Supreme Court has just resolved it after 70 years.

The founder's descendants have kept the trade mark under their ownership but focused on other markets, such as displaying old models or making miniature replicas. Therefore, they tried to prevent a company from registering the trade mark for manufactured automobiles, establishing that the action was looking for an appropriation of the reputation of the previous trade mark. But on February 8 2017, the decision was published and it established that they have lost exclusivity due to lack of use. The Supreme Court recognised that "the reputation associated with the 'Hispano-Suiza' sign is essentially historical, without a real link to the actual company".

In the different instances, it has been established that even though Hispano-Suiza is a well-known trade mark in the Spanish territory, it is not because of the use of the trade name Hispano Suiza, Automobile Factory, SA, but only because of the memory of the legendary cars, which stopped being manufactured more than 80 years ago.

Time has established that the lack of manufacturing activity, repair and sale of vehicles under the mark in question has caused the loss of the trade mark registrations and trade names in certain markets.

The sentences have decreed that there is no use of prestige or reputation that can associate the business activities developed by the heirs of the original trade mark with the activity that originates the entire real case.

In this case, the question is if the historical reputation of a trade mark is enough to cover different business activities even if it no longer develops the main activity that gave the brand its distinction. At present, the legislation is clear in regards to the loss of trade mark rights for lack of use: no use means you cannot live from the past.

Ramón Moreda


PONS IPGlorieta Rubén Darío, 428010 – Madrid SpainTel: +34 917007600Fax: +34 913086103clientes@pons.eswww.ponsip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Six hires across the IP spectrum reflect Orrick’s efforts to better serve tech clients across the IP lifecycle
David Stone, partner at White & Case, argues that the government’s planned reforms will modernise and futureproof UK design law, but leave two of the thorniest problems unresolved
Max Scott will join the firm’s IP transactions group in California, becoming the latest Weil IP partner to secure their future
Yonatan Drori, attorney at Drori-Stav IP in Israel, explains why foreign counsel must treat Israel’s patent disclosure requirements as an ongoing obligation, rather than a one-off formality
From Japan to Southeast Asia, domestic and regional firms picked up some of the biggest prizes, while key foreign players maintained momentum
Earlier this month, Managing IP had exclusively reported that the French arm of Taylor Wessing was minded to pull out of the deal
Our latest podcast examines how Weil’s IP practice evolved, where its practitioners could (and will) go next, and which firms and markets stand to benefit from the redistribution of talent
Former Latham partner Chris Henry and transactions lawyer Liza Cotter are heading to the firm as Weil’s IP practice starts to disperse
Rival IP teams return to court for a closely watched appeal over AI and copyright, but observers hoping for answers to some of the technology’s biggest legal questions may be left disappointed
Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Gift this article