All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 Managing IP is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Scandinavia: Attorney-client privilege for patent attorneys in Sweden

Sweden is a country well-known for its many industries and innovations and is in fact among the top five PCT filers per capita in the world. An invention is per definition a sensitive IP asset that needs to be taken care of properly. There are a number of strategic routes to choose between: should the invention be kept secret, should it be published for prophylactic purpose or should a patent application be filed? In this process of handling an IP asset many different stakeholders are involved in order to find the best strategic route. It is of great importance that discussions between an advisor, such as a patent attorney, and a client are kept secret and that a third party is hindered from accessing such information. For example, it could be especially important to keep secret previous assessments of patentability in a discovery process during a dispute.

The possibility to keep correspondence between an adviser and a client secret is often referred to as attorney-client privilege. In some jurisdictions the attorney-client privilege is by law granted only to an attorney-at-law being a member of a Bar association (Advokatsamfundet in Sweden) or the like, also called an advokat (Sweden). The situation is sometimes different for a patent attorney who is not by law granted the same possibility of attorney-client privilege. There are however exceptions.

A patent attorney is an engineer trained in certain legal matters with the possibility to get authorisations. Some authorisations grant the patent attorney a similar possibility of attorney-client privilege as the advokat for certain matters. For example, a European patent attorney (EPA) is granted attorney-client evidentiary privilege from disclosure in proceedings before the European Patent Office (EPO). This refers for example to assessment of patentability and validity as well as for the preparation of European patent applications. But what happens if the case relates to matter in a different jurisdiction than before the EPO?

Since 2010 Sweden has a law that governs the authorisation of Swedish patent attorneys under the organisation Patentombudsnämnden. The law stipulates attorney-client privilege for authorised Swedish patent attorneys. Sweden is actually alone among the Scandinavian countries to explicitly grant a patent attorney such privilege. The law puts an authorised Swedish patent attorney on an equal footing with an advokat for patent-related matters. It should be noted that also attorneys-at-law can be authorised Swedish patent attorneys. Hence, in Sweden sensitive patent information need not be run through an advokat in order to safeguard client-attorney privilege, but may be handled directly by an authorised Swedish patent attorney.


Peter Ekwall

ZaccoArne Jacobsens Alle 15DK-2300 Copenhagen S DenmarkTel: +45 39 48 80 00Fax: +45 39 48 80

More from across our site

The US Supreme Court rejected an appeal on American Axle, dashing hopes of a judicial fix to patent eligibility uncertainty
The Copyright Office refused to grant protection on the basis that the authorship couldn’t be distinguished from the final work produced by the program
COVID vaccines top Clarivate’s new brands list; Fed Circuit reverses Coca-Cola’s TTAB win; Skechers sues Brooks; USPTO to retire Public PAIR tool; CCB sees cricket complaint
Lawyers should pay attention to APJs’ questions and remember that PTAB proceedings aren’t jury trials, say former PTAB judges
The USPTO cancelled ‘Galavava’ and 'Surfstar Wake' and partly cancelled ‘Heika’ this month
We have published all the 2022 rankings of the leading firms for patent litigation and protection work
In-house and private practice counsel say UK judges have raised the bar for preliminary injunction requests
António Campinos will serve another five years as EPO president – perhaps he’ll calm unrest at the office in that time
LGBTQ IP lawyers say using rainbow colours and posting solidarity messages on social media must be followed by concrete action
Brand owners bemoan counterfeiters’ latest wheeze and say enforcement authorities should get more involved
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree