Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Scandinavia: Attorney-client privilege for patent attorneys in Sweden

Sweden is a country well-known for its many industries and innovations and is in fact among the top five PCT filers per capita in the world. An invention is per definition a sensitive IP asset that needs to be taken care of properly. There are a number of strategic routes to choose between: should the invention be kept secret, should it be published for prophylactic purpose or should a patent application be filed? In this process of handling an IP asset many different stakeholders are involved in order to find the best strategic route. It is of great importance that discussions between an advisor, such as a patent attorney, and a client are kept secret and that a third party is hindered from accessing such information. For example, it could be especially important to keep secret previous assessments of patentability in a discovery process during a dispute.

The possibility to keep correspondence between an adviser and a client secret is often referred to as attorney-client privilege. In some jurisdictions the attorney-client privilege is by law granted only to an attorney-at-law being a member of a Bar association (Advokatsamfundet in Sweden) or the like, also called an advokat (Sweden). The situation is sometimes different for a patent attorney who is not by law granted the same possibility of attorney-client privilege. There are however exceptions.

A patent attorney is an engineer trained in certain legal matters with the possibility to get authorisations. Some authorisations grant the patent attorney a similar possibility of attorney-client privilege as the advokat for certain matters. For example, a European patent attorney (EPA) is granted attorney-client evidentiary privilege from disclosure in proceedings before the European Patent Office (EPO). This refers for example to assessment of patentability and validity as well as for the preparation of European patent applications. But what happens if the case relates to matter in a different jurisdiction than before the EPO?

Since 2010 Sweden has a law that governs the authorisation of Swedish patent attorneys under the organisation Patentombudsnämnden. The law stipulates attorney-client privilege for authorised Swedish patent attorneys. Sweden is actually alone among the Scandinavian countries to explicitly grant a patent attorney such privilege. The law puts an authorised Swedish patent attorney on an equal footing with an advokat for patent-related matters. It should be noted that also attorneys-at-law can be authorised Swedish patent attorneys. Hence, in Sweden sensitive patent information need not be run through an advokat in order to safeguard client-attorney privilege, but may be handled directly by an authorised Swedish patent attorney.


Peter Ekwall

ZaccoArne Jacobsens Alle 15DK-2300 Copenhagen S DenmarkTel: +45 39 48 80 00Fax: +45 39 48 80

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Counsel are eying domestic industry, concurrent PTAB proceedings and heightened scrutiny of cases before institution
Jack Daniel’s has a good chance of winning its dispute over dog toys, but SCOTUS will still want to protect free speech, predict sources
AI users and lawyers discuss why the rulebook for registering AI-generated content may create problems and needs further work
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
A technical effect must still be evident in the original patent filing, the EBoA said in its G2/21 decision today, March 23
Brands should not be deterred from pursuing lookalike producers, and an unfair advantage claim could be the key, say Emma Teichmann and Geoff Steward at Stobbs
Justice Mellor’s highly anticipated ruling surprised SEP owners and reassured implementers that the UK may not be so hostile after all
The England and Wales High Court's judgment comes ahead of a separate hearing concerning one of the patents-in-suit at the EPO
While the rules allow foreign firms to open local offices and offer IP services, a ban on litigation and practising Indian law could mean little will change
A New York federal court heard oral arguments this week in a copyright case pitting publishing giants against a digital library