Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Singapore: IP alternative dispute resolution initiatives

In September 2011, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was signed between the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) to establish a joint dispute resolution procedure to facilitate the mediation of IP disputes before IPOS. The intent of this initiative was to promote mediation as an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) option within the IPOS framework, with potential advantages for international parties seeking to settle related disputes in multiple jurisdictions.

In recent years, IPOS has introduced new ADR initiatives to expand the options that applicants can consider for the satisfactory resolution of IP disputes, rather than the costly path of litigation. For example, an expert determination option was introduced in April 2014 allowing parties to mutually choose one or more technical experts to resolve technical issues in an IP disputes before settling or committing to mediation or arbitration.

In April this year, IPOS introduced a Mediation Promotion Scheme (MPS) whereby parties who opt for mediation in resolving IP disputes before IPOS will be funded up to S$5,500 (US$4,000) per mediation case, regardless of the outcome. Parties are free to appoint a mediation provider of their choice under the MPS, such as the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center, Singapore International Mediation Centre or Singapore Mediation Centre, as well as a mutually agreed upon mediator.

To be eligible for MPS, the parties must (1) submit an existing dispute before IPOS to mediation; (2) agree to the presence of an observer (shadow mediator) to sit in at the mediation; (3) provide feedback on the mediation; and (4) advise IPOS of the agent's fees. The procedural steps are relatively simple. They require that IPOS be informed of the intention to apply for funding before mediation starts and that an application form be submitted within one month from the date of the invoice from the mediation service provider.

This mediation initiative is aimed at further promoting the strengths of mediation as an attractive IP ADR option which can achieve a customised, win-win solution for all parties. Consequently, the hope of IPOS is that upon experiencing the benefits of mediation, parties will give serious consideration to electing the mediation option in future IPOS proceedings, even without external funding.

The MPS has been further complemented by the appointment in April of a panel of IP adjudicators at IPOS to give disputing parties the opportunity to have their cases heard by established academics and legal professionals. These initiatives demonstrate the continuing commitment of IPOS to expand the available ADR options and further the standing of Singapore's IP infrastructure not only in the ASEAN region but also globally.

Collopy_Dan
Hilton

Daniel Collopy

Alexander Hilton


Spruson & Ferguson (Asia) Pte Ltd152 Beach Road#37-05/06 Gateway EastSingapore 189721Tel: +65 6333 7200Fax: +65 6333 7222mail.asia@spruson.comwww.spruson.com

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Counsel are eying domestic industry, concurrent PTAB proceedings and heightened scrutiny of cases before institution
Jack Daniel’s has a good chance of winning its dispute over dog toys, but SCOTUS will still want to protect free speech, predict sources
AI users and lawyers discuss why the rulebook for registering AI-generated content may create problems and needs further work
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
A technical effect must still be evident in the original patent filing, the EBoA said in its G2/21 decision today, March 23
Brands should not be deterred from pursuing lookalike producers, and an unfair advantage claim could be the key, say Emma Teichmann and Geoff Steward at Stobbs
Justice Mellor’s highly anticipated ruling surprised SEP owners and reassured implementers that the UK may not be so hostile after all
The England and Wales High Court's judgment comes ahead of a separate hearing concerning one of the patents-in-suit at the EPO
While the rules allow foreign firms to open local offices and offer IP services, a ban on litigation and practising Indian law could mean little will change
A New York federal court heard oral arguments this week in a copyright case pitting publishing giants against a digital library