Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Belgium: Belgid’Or 3D mark infringement leads to counterfeiting verdict

In its decision of January 27 2015 Côte d'Or vs Belgid'Or, the eighth chamber of the Brussels Court of appeal had to rule on different Kraft Foods trade marks and the possible infringement thereof by Natrajacali.

Kraft Foods markets Côte d'Or chocolates and is the owner of several trademarks, including the Benelux and Community word trade marks Côte d'Or, the Benelux semi-figurative trade mark (figure 1) and a Benelux three-dimensional trade mark for its specific chocolate bars characterised by three grooves on both sides of the bar (figure 2).

On the one hand, the Court ruled that by using the sign Belgid'Or, Natrajacali did not infringe Kraft Foods' well-known trade mark Côte d'Or. It held that the signs at hand are visually and phonetically similar to a low level and that they do not share any conceptual meaning, so that the signs are globally similar to a low level. Even though Côte d'Or is considered a well-known trade mark, the limited similarity between the signs precludes a likelihood of confusion – or association – to arise between the signs at hand.

The Court also concluded that the marketed packaging of Natrajacali (figure 3) did not infringe Kraft's semi-figurative trade mark (figure 4), in spite of the fact that the defendant used a retro script for Belgid'Or in its packaging, looking like the one Kraft uses for some of its Côte d'Or chocolates. The Court emphasised that Kraft does not enjoy a monopoly on retro policies for chocolates.

On the other hand, the Court acknowledged Kraft Foods' claim based on its three-dimensional trade mark for chocolate bars. According to the Court, by using specific chocolate bars characterised by three grooves on both sides, Natrajacali infringed Kraft Foods' three-dimensional trade mark rights. Hence, Natrajacali was ordered to stop marketing its counterfeit chocolates, to stop commercialising chocolate bars with identical or similar form to Kraft Foods' three-dimensional trade mark and to refrain from depicting it on its packaging.

Finally, the Court dismissed the claim based on unfair trade mark practices since no transfer of goodwill occurred and Natrajacali didn't produce any misleading advertising relating to its goods. Even though Natrajacali marketed a similar shape of chocolate bars, it didn't act in contradiction with the market's fair practices.

Overall, this decision shows the direct and indirect effects of three-dimensional trade marks: based on its 3D trademark, Kraft Foods got Natrajali ordered to change the form of its chocolate bars and its packaging as it depicts the infringing goods. The conclusion is that holding a 3D trade mark allows the owner to contest the use of an identical or similar shape for identical or similar goods and to forbid third parties from depicting it on its packaging, a general rule to be remembered when advising on whether to register 3D trade marks.


Claire Godefroid

GEVERS Holidaystraat, 5B-1831 Diegem - BrusselsBelgiumTel: +32 2 715 37 11Fax: +32 2 715 37

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas has hired former Anand & Anand partner Swati Sharma and hopes to compete with specialist IP firms
Rapporteur-Judge András Kupecz ruled that education and training weren’t legitimate reasons for a member of the public to access documents
Searches for comparison prior art will be a little easier, but practitioners will have to put more thought into claim construction and design patent titles
The Helsinki local division rejected AIM Sport’s request for a preliminary injunction in a dispute with rival Supponor
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The FTC’s plans to scrutinise improperly listed Orange Book patents could make these listings more important in litigation, but firms should be looking at this anyway
Counsel at Debevoise & Plimpton explain how they helped food delivery business Grubhub avoid a preliminary injunction at the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
European lawyers tell Managing IP how the legal market is reacting to the first few months of the UPC and why cases are set to take off
The ban could be extended or cancelled, depending on whether Judge Pauline Newman cooperates with an investigation, the Judicial Council of the Federal Circuit stated
Sources say some China-based lawyers are prepared to take large pay cuts to join stable practices, but most firms are sceptical about new hires