France: Two measures to improve access to patent system
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

France: Two measures to improve access to patent system

In order to facilitate access for small business entities and startups to the patent protection of their inventions, the French Patent Office recently presented a draft of an amendment to the French Patent Law introducing a provisional patent application (PPA) and a 10-year utility patent.

The utility certificate is an industrial property title analogous to a patent of invention (same patentability criteria) but limited to a six-year duration, granted without any search report but linked to a specific filing date. When suing for infringement one request the establishment of a search report.

Note that that any patent or utility certificate may claim the priority of a previous French patent or utility certificate application.

The minimum requirements for filing a PPA would be to have a clear description and drawings. There will be no need to draft claims. The applicant would have a 12-month period to convert the PPA into a patent or a utility patent application.

Figure 1: The present situation is illustrated

Source: FPO


Figure 2: The proposed future situation is shown

Source: FPO


The utility patent applicant would have the possibility to convert it into a patent application.

The grant of a utility patent could still be obtained without the establishment of a search report. Again, in such a scheme, any patent or utility patent may claim the priority of a previous French patent or utility patent application.

These proposals have been submitted by the French Patent Office for comments and should become more mature in the near future.

The introduction of the PPA and of the utility patent would allow applicants to elaborate a more sophisticated strategy of protection in line with the applicant's strategy, but would also introduce more complexity and entail certain risks especially concerning the quality of the definition of patented inventions and the existence of patent titles granted without any search report.

Kohn_Philippe-100

Philippe Kohn


GEVERS41, avenue de FriedlandParis 75008, FranceTel: +33 1 45 00 48 48Fax: +33 1 40 67 95 67paris@gevers.euwww.gevers.eu

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

John Keville, partner at Sheppard Mullin, explains how he secured a patent subject matter eligibility victory for his client against GoPro
An IP partner at Womble Bond Dickinson explains how its combination with Lewis Roca will create a fully-rounded litigation and prosecution service
Ronen Speyer of Evalueserve explains why in a competitive business landscape, IP has become a key driver in gaining a competitive advantage
Michael Sharp, who moved to Canadian firm Field Law from Aurora Cannabis in June, said he is enjoying cross-practice collaboration at his new firm
Yasemin Kenaroğlu tells us about setting up ‘IP School’, Turkish coffee, and why IP is like an iceberg
Irena Royzman, who joined Orrick earlier this year, explains how she's collaborated with her new colleagues to address IP policy concerns
Partners at Fenwick explain why they had to be aggressive when helping Lashify win a patent infringement trial
Big law firms are reorganising their IP departments in response to changing client needs and new legal challenges
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Louis-Pierre Gravelle discusses why he didn’t want to be part of the newly acquired Bereskin & Parr and the opportunities he’s eyeing at his new home, Dipchand
Gift this article