France: Two measures to improve access to patent system

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

France: Two measures to improve access to patent system

In order to facilitate access for small business entities and startups to the patent protection of their inventions, the French Patent Office recently presented a draft of an amendment to the French Patent Law introducing a provisional patent application (PPA) and a 10-year utility patent.

The utility certificate is an industrial property title analogous to a patent of invention (same patentability criteria) but limited to a six-year duration, granted without any search report but linked to a specific filing date. When suing for infringement one request the establishment of a search report.

Note that that any patent or utility certificate may claim the priority of a previous French patent or utility certificate application.

The minimum requirements for filing a PPA would be to have a clear description and drawings. There will be no need to draft claims. The applicant would have a 12-month period to convert the PPA into a patent or a utility patent application.

Figure 1: The present situation is illustrated

Source: FPO


Figure 2: The proposed future situation is shown

Source: FPO


The utility patent applicant would have the possibility to convert it into a patent application.

The grant of a utility patent could still be obtained without the establishment of a search report. Again, in such a scheme, any patent or utility patent may claim the priority of a previous French patent or utility patent application.

These proposals have been submitted by the French Patent Office for comments and should become more mature in the near future.

The introduction of the PPA and of the utility patent would allow applicants to elaborate a more sophisticated strategy of protection in line with the applicant's strategy, but would also introduce more complexity and entail certain risks especially concerning the quality of the definition of patented inventions and the existence of patent titles granted without any search report.

Kohn_Philippe-100

Philippe Kohn


GEVERS41, avenue de FriedlandParis 75008, FranceTel: +33 1 45 00 48 48Fax: +33 1 40 67 95 67paris@gevers.euwww.gevers.eu

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm explains how it secured a $170.6 million verdict against the government in a patent dispute surrounding airport technology, and why the case led to interest from other inventors
Developments of note included the court partially allowing a claim concerning confidentiality clubs and a decision involving technology used in football matches
The firm said adding capability in the French capital completes its coverage of all major patent litigation jurisdictions as it strives for UPC excellence
Marc Fenster explains how keeping the jury focused on the most relevant facts helped secure a $279m win for his client against Samsung
Clients are divided on what externally funded IP firms bring to the table, so those firms must prove why the benefits outweigh the downsides
Rahul Bhartiya, AI coordinator at the EUIPO, discusses the office’s strategy, collaboration with other IP offices, and getting rid of routine tasks
A boom in transactional work and a heightened awareness of IP have helped boost revenue for the rebranded commercial services team
Clemens Heusch, head of global litigation and dispute resolution at Nokia, tells us why open conversations – and respectful challenges – lead to the best results
Siegmund Gutman, who joined Mintz one year ago, explains the firm’s approach to life sciences litigation and what it means for hiring plans
The merger of two IP boutiques could prompt others to follow suit and challenge Australia’s externally funded firms
Gift this article