Ease data privacy rules to protect copyright, CJEU told

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Ease data privacy rules to protect copyright, CJEU told

AdobeStock_359548463_Editorial_Use_Only (1).jpeg

A court adviser said copyright authorities must be able to access data linked to internet protocol addresses where necessary

An adviser to the Court of Justice of the EU said national copyright infringement investigators should be given greater access to personal data in an opinion published on Thursday, October 27.

Advocate general (AG) Maciej Szpunar concluded that EU privacy laws allowed for the retention of civil identity data, such as contact details linked to internet protocol addresses, when it was the only way of identifying alleged infringers.

If the opinion were adopted, it would be a significant shift from established CJEU case law, which has so far limited identification via internet protocol addresses to instances of serious crime and threats to public safety.

The AG issued the non-binding opinion in response to a challenge brought by four civil liberty groups against a 2010 decree from the French government.

The decree allowed France’s Regulatory Authority for Audiovisual and Digital Communication, formerly known as HADOPI, access to civil identity data.

The retention of such data should be time-limited and subject to the principle of proportionality, as required by the EU’s Charter of Fundamental Rights, Szpunar wrote.

Szpunar said the CJEU’s previous position left national governments unable to use the only means of investigating some online copyright infringements.

“That would lead to de facto systemic impunity for offences committed exclusively online, not just infringements of intellectual property rights.

“Short of accepting that a whole range of criminal offences may evade prosecution entirely, I take the view that the balance between the different interests at stake should be examined afresh,” Szpunar wrote.

According to the CJEU, judges have begun to consider the case.

The CJEU is not duty-bound to follow AG opinions but does so in many instances.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted
Gift this article