Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Ease data privacy rules to protect copyright, CJEU told

AdobeStock_359548463_Editorial_Use_Only (1).jpeg

A court adviser said copyright authorities must be able to access data linked to internet protocol addresses where necessary

An adviser to the Court of Justice of the EU said national copyright infringement investigators should be given greater access to personal data in an opinion published on Thursday, October 27.

Advocate general (AG) Maciej Szpunar concluded that EU privacy laws allowed for the retention of civil identity data, such as contact details linked to internet protocol addresses, when it was the only way of identifying alleged infringers.

If the opinion were adopted, it would be a significant shift from established CJEU case law, which has so far limited identification via internet protocol addresses to instances of serious crime and threats to public safety.

The AG issued the non-binding opinion in response to a challenge brought by four civil liberty groups against a 2010 decree from the French government.

The decree allowed France’s Regulatory Authority for Audiovisual and Digital Communication, formerly known as HADOPI, access to civil identity data.

The retention of such data should be time-limited and subject to the principle of proportionality, as required by the EU’s Charter of Fundamental Rights, Szpunar wrote.

Szpunar said the CJEU’s previous position left national governments unable to use the only means of investigating some online copyright infringements.

“That would lead to de facto systemic impunity for offences committed exclusively online, not just infringements of intellectual property rights.

“Short of accepting that a whole range of criminal offences may evade prosecution entirely, I take the view that the balance between the different interests at stake should be examined afresh,” Szpunar wrote.

According to the CJEU, judges have begun to consider the case.

The CJEU is not duty-bound to follow AG opinions but does so in many instances.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas has hired former Anand & Anand partner Swati Sharma and hopes to compete with specialist IP firms
Rapporteur-Judge András Kupecz ruled that education and training weren’t legitimate reasons for a member of the public to access documents
Searches for comparison prior art will be a little easier, but practitioners will have to put more thought into claim construction and design patent titles
The Helsinki local division rejected AIM Sport’s request for a preliminary injunction in a dispute with rival Supponor
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The FTC’s plans to scrutinise improperly listed Orange Book patents could make these listings more important in litigation, but firms should be looking at this anyway
Counsel at Debevoise & Plimpton explain how they helped food delivery business Grubhub avoid a preliminary injunction at the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
European lawyers tell Managing IP how the legal market is reacting to the first few months of the UPC and why cases are set to take off
The ban could be extended or cancelled, depending on whether Judge Pauline Newman cooperates with an investigation, the Judicial Council of the Federal Circuit stated
Sources say some China-based lawyers are prepared to take large pay cuts to join stable practices, but most firms are sceptical about new hires