Ease data privacy rules to protect copyright, CJEU told
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Ease data privacy rules to protect copyright, CJEU told

AdobeStock_359548463_Editorial_Use_Only (1).jpeg

A court adviser said copyright authorities must be able to access data linked to internet protocol addresses where necessary

An adviser to the Court of Justice of the EU said national copyright infringement investigators should be given greater access to personal data in an opinion published on Thursday, October 27.

Advocate general (AG) Maciej Szpunar concluded that EU privacy laws allowed for the retention of civil identity data, such as contact details linked to internet protocol addresses, when it was the only way of identifying alleged infringers.

If the opinion were adopted, it would be a significant shift from established CJEU case law, which has so far limited identification via internet protocol addresses to instances of serious crime and threats to public safety.

The AG issued the non-binding opinion in response to a challenge brought by four civil liberty groups against a 2010 decree from the French government.

The decree allowed France’s Regulatory Authority for Audiovisual and Digital Communication, formerly known as HADOPI, access to civil identity data.

The retention of such data should be time-limited and subject to the principle of proportionality, as required by the EU’s Charter of Fundamental Rights, Szpunar wrote.

Szpunar said the CJEU’s previous position left national governments unable to use the only means of investigating some online copyright infringements.

“That would lead to de facto systemic impunity for offences committed exclusively online, not just infringements of intellectual property rights.

“Short of accepting that a whole range of criminal offences may evade prosecution entirely, I take the view that the balance between the different interests at stake should be examined afresh,” Szpunar wrote.

According to the CJEU, judges have begun to consider the case.

The CJEU is not duty-bound to follow AG opinions but does so in many instances.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Tom Treutler, who previously managed the Vietnamese office of Tilleke & Gibbins, has joined East IP
Counsel discuss upcoming AI and data privacy legislation and what they’ve learned since Chile joined the Madrid Protocol
INTA has postponed its planned Annual Meeting in Dubai, but the organisation should think carefully about whether it wants to go there at all
The firm has named its new managing director after its former Asia head resigned earlier this year
As law firms explore how best to support clients at the UPC, members of the UPCLA network believe they have found the best of both worlds
The Industry Patent Quality Charter hosted a conference in which it discussed the importance of granting high-quality patents
Julia Holden explains why, if she weren’t in IP, she would be directing and producing live English-language theatre
The impact of the recently agreed treaty may be modest at first but is likely to become more significant over time
Meet the esteemed judges who are assessing the first-ever Social Impact Awards
Lawyers debate whether the Supreme Court’s ruling helps maintain confidence in the trademark system
Gift this article