Breaking: Ed Sheeran wins ‘Shape of You’ copyright trial

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Breaking: Ed Sheeran wins ‘Shape of You’ copyright trial

Entrance to the Royal Court of Justice

The England and Wales High Court found ‘compelling evidence’ that ‘Shape of You’ did not infringe a songwriter’s earlier work

Ed Sheeran has won a copyright infringement trial centring on his 2017 hit ‘Shape of You’, the England and Wales High Court ruled this morning, April 6.

In the judgment, His Honour Justice Antony Zacaroli said there was “compelling evidence” that Sheeran’s ‘Shape of You’ originated from sources other than the song he was accused of copying.

Singer-songwriter Sheeran was facing accusations that ‘Shape of You’ copied aspects from ‘Oh Why’, a 2015 song written by Sami Chokri and Ross O’Donoghue, performed by Chokri under the alias Sami Switch. Sheeran denied copyright infringement.

The portion of ‘Shape of You’ questioned was the ‘oh I’ hook, which was alleged to be strikingly similar to an ‘oh why’ refrain in Switch’s work.

‘Shape of You’ is one of Sheeran’s most successful tracks and was number one in the singles charts of 34 countries.

In court last month, Andrew Sutcliffe QC, a barrister at 3VB in London acting for Chokri and O’Donoghue, described Sheeran as “an obsessive music squirrel” who “borrows ideas” from other artists.

But handing down judgment this morning, Zacaroli said that although there are similarities between the tracks, this threshold is “only a starting point” to a successful infringement claim.

To prove infringement under UK copyright law, it must be shown that a defendant likely had access to the allegedly infringed work and that a substantial portion must have been copied.

One of Switch’s arguments was that Sheeran must have encountered the song, as it appeared on well-known YouTube channel SBTV, of which Sheeran is a fan. Switch also noted that he had targeted Sheeran on Twitter in the hope of sparking interest in his work.

But Zacaroli said the evidence put forward to prove access was “no more than speculative” and found it was likely Sheeran had not heard ‘Oh I’.

In 2017, Sheeran faced a separate copyright allegation, which centred on another of his songs called ‘Photograph’. That case settled the same year.

 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Charles Harding plans to build a new team around life sciences oppositions and contentious work, drawing on his three decades developing a practice from scratch at D Young & Co
The firm reveals how its litigation strategies informed the arguments that took Masimo’s judgment past $818 million
The firm was rebuilding its IP practice through a string of patent hires and a Texas expansion, but its dissolution has put the newly built talent back into the market
AI can exploit longstanding gaps in copyright protection at remarkable speed, but EU law still provides tools to fight back, says Simon Hembt at Bird & Bird
The firm has tapped a local patent trio to establish a foothold in the market and broaden its national presence
New Asia-Pacific IP head Jonathan Chu is eyeing opportunities arising from Chinese technology licensing, overseas enforcement and increasingly IP-heavy cross-border deals
Europe’s largest intellectual property convention and trade fair is back: IP Service World 2026 takes place in Munich from November 23–25 – the 16th edition, with 1,400-plus attendees from 55-plus nations, 100-plus speakers, and 100-plus exhibitors. Three days. Two focused areas. One IP marketplace.
Mehmet Gün and Uğur Aktekin discuss four decades of change in Türkiye’s legal market, the firm’s commitment to independence and the challenge of building an institution that can outlast its founders
Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Gift this article