Japan looks to provide protection for non-traditional marks

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Japan looks to provide protection for non-traditional marks

At yesterday’s users’ meeting, representatives from the Japan Patent Office (JPO) gave an update on recent activities and upcoming developments in Japanese trademark law. One of the biggest changes is that the country is looking to introduce protection for non-traditional marks.

One reason for this is the increasing popularity of these marks. In fact, the JPO notes that Japanese companies have been filing for and receiving nontraditional marks in other jurisdictions.

A draft version of a bill to amend the Japanese Trademark Act looks to provide for protection of color marks, sounds, moving marks, holograms, and positional marks. However, the draft bill does not provide for protection of scent and taste marks, due to concerns that it is too difficult to specify the scope of such marks and there is doubt that there is immediate need for them.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Leaders at the newly merged firm Jones Maxwell Smith & Davis reveal their plan to take on bigger firms while attracting more clients and talent
Charles Achkar, who will bring a team of two with him, said he was excited about joining ‘one of the few strong IP boutiques’
Andy Lee, head of IP at Brandsmiths and winner of the Soft IP Practitioner of the Year award, tells us why 2024 was a seminal year and why clients value brave advice
The deal to acquire MIP's parent company is expected to complete by the end of May 2025
Jinwon Chun discusses the need for vigilance, his love for iced coffee, and preparing for INTA
Karl Barnfather’s new patent practice will focus on protecting and enforcing tech innovations in the electronics, AI, and software industries
Partner Ranjini Acharya explains how her Federal Circuit debut resulted in her convincing the court to rule that machine learning technology was not patent-eligible
Paul Hastings and Smart & Biggar also won multiple awards, while Baker McKenzie picked up a significant prize
Burford Capital study finds that in-house lawyers have become more likely to monetise patents, but that their IP portfolios are still underutilised
Robert Reading and Faidon Zisis at Clarivate unpick some of the data surrounding music-related trademarks
Gift this article