AIPLA attacks USPTO sequestration

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

AIPLA attacks USPTO sequestration

AIPLA president Jeff Lewis has written to the Office of Management and Budget protesting against the application of sequestration to the USPTO

The letter, sent on Tuesday to OMB director Sylvia Mathews Burwell, claims that applying sequestration will significantly reduce the USPTO’s funding at a critical stage in the implementation of the AIA.

Lewis, speaking on behalf of AIPLA’s 15,000 members, noted that the USPTO depends entirely on user fee collections to fund its services.

“It is vitally important for the USPTO to have full access to all its fee collections, to be able to do the best job possible to help secure and maintain our intellectual property system as a key economic driver to attract and protect investment in new technology.”

He said that recent progress in reducing the backlog of applications, which has partly been achieved by hiring more examiners, developing new IT systems and establishing more effective administrative processes, is likely to be undermined by the confiscation of USPTO funds.

“Any delay in these improvements represents a major step back from the commitment of the Administration to the AIA and a fundamental challenge to the innovation and job creation these improvements represent.”

Under former USPTO director David Kappos, who left the organisation in January after resigning from his post in November, the backlog was reduced by 20% despite a 5% average annual increase in patent applications. Over the last two years of his administration, Kappos increased the number of patent examiners by 30% to over 8,000.

Following the departure of Kappos, the USPTO is now being led by acting director Teresa Stanek Rea.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article