HTC wins 3-1 in battle against Apple at the ITC

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

HTC wins 3-1 in battle against Apple at the ITC

HTC is likely to have to adapt its smartphones for sale in the US, after the US International Trade Commission found that it infringed two claims of a patent owned by rival Apple

In yesterday's final determination, the ITC said that HTC violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act by importing and selling phones that infringed two claims of Apple's US patent 5,946,647.

The patent is titled "System and method for performing an action on a structure in computer-generated data" and covers technology allowing users to perform tasks such as calling a phone number or adding a calendar appointment with a single finger tap on the screen.

HTC has until April 19 to comply with the ruling. This is to provide "a transition period for US carriers" said the Commission. It can also import refurbished handsets until December 19 2013 for replacements under warranty.

Despite that finding, the decision was generally good news for the Taiwanese company, which makes smartphones that run Google's Android operating system.

The ITC reversed a preliminary finding that HTC had also infringed two further claims of the '647 patent and another patent, 6,343,263 for a "Real-time signal processing system for serially transmitted data".

It also upheld a finding that two further US patents, 5,481,721 and 6,275,983, were not infringed.

In a statement, HTC's general counsel Grace Lei said: "We are very pleased with the determination and we respect it."

Apple brought the case before the ITC in April 2010. Several of the patents at issue in the case had also been asserted against Nokia, but that dispute was settled earlier this year.

The ITC case is one of many disputes between Apple and other smartphone makers, many of whom use Android. Apple and HTC have a number of other suits pending against each other in the ITC and in federal courts.

For more on the smartphone patent wars, see Managing IP's dedicated topic page.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Gift this article