Portugal: New IP Code in Mozambique

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Portugal: New IP Code in Mozambique

Among Portuguese-speaking countries in Africa, one of the recent events regarding IP which deserves to be highlighted is the approval, in Mozambique, of the new Industrial Property Code (IPC) by Decree number 47/2015, published in the Boletim da República (Official Gazette) of December 31 2015, which comes into effect 90 days after its publication.

This new Code improves the drafting of some of its articles in an attempt to overcome doubts regarding the interpretation thereof, amends several deadlines aiming at a swift processing of the cases submitted to the Industrial Property Institute (IPI) and provides as well additional instruments for impugnation of a decision issued by the IPI.

The new drafting of number 3 of the IPC's article 162 clarifies that with respect to the deadline for the submissions of the Declaration of Intent to Use (DIU) for international trade mark registrations, the date to take into account will be the filing date of the mentioned application at WIPO's International Bureau.

With regard to patents, the main amendments introduced in the new Code bring the Mozambican legislation closer to the practices required for long in most of the countries/organisations and they do not constitute a novelty for the applicants of patent applications.

The major alteration in this IPC as far as patents are concerned is the substantive examination. Contrary to what happened before, the patent applicant will have to request that examination and pay the respective fees within 36 months after the filing date in Mozambique, while previously it was sufficient to comply with the formal requirements for the application to be published and granted.

Additionally, in the scope of this new IPC it was bestowed to the Inspecção Nacional das Actividades Económicas [National Inspection of Economic Activities] the responsibility to investigate the violations typified in Article 212 of the new IPC.

Lastly, this new Code stipulates that the Official Bulletin will be published monthly and that any gap in this new IPC will be regulated by the civil and criminal rules which do not contradict the industrial property principles.

Therefore, it is with great expectation that we wait to see how this new legislation will be enforced and if the changes introduced in it will result in benefits to all the economic agents.

Goncalves_Marcia
Matosa_Marco

Márcia Gonçalves

Marco Matosa


Raul César Ferreira (Herd) SARua do Patrocínio 941399-019 Lisboa, PortugalTel: +351 213 907 373Fax: +351 213 978 754mail@rcf.ptwww.rcf.pt

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

While the firm lost several litigators this month, Winston & Strawn is betting that its transatlantic merger will strengthen its IP practice
In other news, Ericsson sought a declaratory judgment against Acer and Netflix filed a cease-and-desist letter against ByteDance over AI misuse
As trade secret filings rise due to AI development and economic espionage concerns, firms are relying on proactive counselling to help clients navigate disputes
IP firm leaders share why they remain positive in the face of falling patent applications from US filers, and how they are meeting a rising demand from China
The power of DEI to swing IP pitches is welcome, but why does it have to be left so late?
Mathew Lucas has joined Pearce IP after spending more than 25 years at Qantm IP-owned firm Davies Collison Cave
Exclusive survey data reveals a generally lax in-house attitude towards DEI, but pitches have been known to turn on a final diversity question
Managing IP will host a ceremony in London on May 1 to reveal the winners
Abigail Wise shares her unusual pathway into the profession, from failing A-levels to becoming Lewis Silkin’s first female IP partner
There are some impressive AI tools available for trademark lawyers, but law firm leaders say humans can still outthink the bots
Gift this article