Portugal: New IP Code in Mozambique

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Portugal: New IP Code in Mozambique

Among Portuguese-speaking countries in Africa, one of the recent events regarding IP which deserves to be highlighted is the approval, in Mozambique, of the new Industrial Property Code (IPC) by Decree number 47/2015, published in the Boletim da República (Official Gazette) of December 31 2015, which comes into effect 90 days after its publication.

This new Code improves the drafting of some of its articles in an attempt to overcome doubts regarding the interpretation thereof, amends several deadlines aiming at a swift processing of the cases submitted to the Industrial Property Institute (IPI) and provides as well additional instruments for impugnation of a decision issued by the IPI.

The new drafting of number 3 of the IPC's article 162 clarifies that with respect to the deadline for the submissions of the Declaration of Intent to Use (DIU) for international trade mark registrations, the date to take into account will be the filing date of the mentioned application at WIPO's International Bureau.

With regard to patents, the main amendments introduced in the new Code bring the Mozambican legislation closer to the practices required for long in most of the countries/organisations and they do not constitute a novelty for the applicants of patent applications.

The major alteration in this IPC as far as patents are concerned is the substantive examination. Contrary to what happened before, the patent applicant will have to request that examination and pay the respective fees within 36 months after the filing date in Mozambique, while previously it was sufficient to comply with the formal requirements for the application to be published and granted.

Additionally, in the scope of this new IPC it was bestowed to the Inspecção Nacional das Actividades Económicas [National Inspection of Economic Activities] the responsibility to investigate the violations typified in Article 212 of the new IPC.

Lastly, this new Code stipulates that the Official Bulletin will be published monthly and that any gap in this new IPC will be regulated by the civil and criminal rules which do not contradict the industrial property principles.

Therefore, it is with great expectation that we wait to see how this new legislation will be enforced and if the changes introduced in it will result in benefits to all the economic agents.

Goncalves_Marcia
Matosa_Marco

Márcia Gonçalves

Marco Matosa


Raul César Ferreira (Herd) SARua do Patrocínio 941399-019 Lisboa, PortugalTel: +351 213 907 373Fax: +351 213 978 754mail@rcf.ptwww.rcf.pt

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Deborah Kirk discusses why IP and technology have become central pillars in transactions and explains why clients need practically minded lawyers
IP STARS, Managing IP’s accreditation title, reveals its latest rankings for patent work, including which firms are moving up
Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
Gift this article