Guest post: UNIFAB raises terrorism concerns in fight against counterfeits

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Guest post: UNIFAB raises terrorism concerns in fight against counterfeits

Guest author Magda Voltolini reports from last week’s UNIFAB European IP Forum in Paris, where the links between counterfeiting and terrorism were in the spotlight

Unifab

The recent UNIFAB report Counterfeiting & Terrorism set the tone of the debates during the 21eme Forum Européen de la Propriété Intellectuelle, which took place in Paris on February 12 and 13.

The Union des Fabricants : Pour la protection internationale de la propriété intellectuelle (UNIFAB) is a central actor in the fight against counterfeits advocating on behalf of the private sector before French and European authorities, agencies and institutions.

Broadly speaking, the Report proposed 10 recommendations to be incorporated in legal frameworks, including:

-          Harmonisation of criminal offences in Europe and alignment of criminal sanctions with international standards.

-          Condemnation of counterfeiting as a means of financing terrorism.

-          Specialisation of judges in criminal courts.

-          Enforcement of a “duty of care” on internet actors.

-          Implementation of accountability rules for all actors in agreements/procedures applicable to trade shows and salons.

-          Creation of civil actions for industry associations, establishment of zero tolerance areas, as well as improvement of innovations tools.

-          Development of anti-counterfeiting cooperation actions in international meetings and sensitive countries.

-          Implementation of imprisonment and monetary penalties committed by organised crime groups in all countries, and autonomous infringement with increased penalties for counterfeits affecting human health and safety.

-          Enhancement in the exchange of information between agencies and addition of counterfeit indicators to policy making priorities.

-          Implementation of awareness initiatives before schools and tourism operators.

During the session “The Proven Links with Organised Criminality and Terrorism” Senator Richard Yung, Member of the French Labor Party and President of the Comite National Anti-Contrefaçon (CNAC) briefly expressed his views on the 10 recommendations.

In respect of an increase of French legislation and specialisation of judges, Senator Yung inferred there are no needs for legal and judiciary modifications. Concerning the French Bill on the financing of terrorism – Projet de loi de lutte contre le terrorisme et son financement – there will be provisions regulating Customs and counterfeit provisions can be endorsed. On cybercrime, he proposed the follow-the-money approach. Additionally, he agreed that international and European partnerships are the way to go from now on.

Hélène Crocquevieille, General Director for Customs and Excise in France, highlighted that:

Recent results from the Customs demonstrate, like the Report of UNIFAB, [it] exists some links between counterfeit trafficking, organised crime and radicalised people who can commit terrorist attacks. The links, however, must be approached with caution: only the investigation following a terrorist act or a criminal conspiracy from a terrorist enterprise, carried out by specialised services such as the Service National de Douane Judiciaire (SNDJ), can validate these links with certainty. Furthermore, so far, there is no evidence that counterfeit trafficking would be a more specific means for financing terrorist acts than other illicit traffics such as tobacco, drugs or protected species.

She also said:

Pending the results of intelligence services analysis and current investigations, the French Customs continue their action in the fight against counterfeiting in order to protect consumers, as well as licit economy, and to increase the possibilities to dismantle criminal activities in our country. In particular, the Customs administration will accelerate the establishment of an inter-ministerial structure in order to strengthen the national strategy and action against counterfeit. French Customs will also act for a rapid implementation of the EU trade marks package that will allow a more efficient fight against transnational counterfeit traffic.

Magda Voltolini is an independent writer based in Paris

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

This year’s IP STARS Americas rankings reveal that firms are expanding their capabilities, particularly in trade secrets and life sciences
Law firms’ expanding IP capabilities are driving broader industry recognition across a wider range of practice areas
As specialist boutiques challenge traditional firm models, major disputes involving Disney, Ericsson, Siemens and Dolby highlight the firms winning work before the UPC
The firm has added two leading damages specialists as it expands beyond technical analysis and deepens its role in the economics of IP litigation
Josh Seidenfeld, partner at DLA Piper, outlines the emerging legal trends that drive the future of life sciences innovation and how stakeholders can prepare for the future
South Korea's One Law Partners is combining with boutique firm Minwho Law Group to leverage global expansion of K-content and build a broader offering spanning IP, tech and regulatory advisory work
Russell Kennedy's Gina Tresidder on juggling matters, delivering hard truths, and why IP ownership is rarely as simple as people think
Attorney Oran Friar and trainee attorney Harry Cunliffe at Reddie & Grose, share that patent filings for clinical LLMs are surging, but success in the UK and Europe hinges on demonstrating technical innovation
Implementers can use the UK courts to seek FRAND terms for patent pool licences
The first credible UPC spinouts are growing, and they are coming from elite patent litigation teams, suggesting specialist litigators may no longer need large platforms to compete
Gift this article