'Pursue pragmatism': Chofn partner on the importance of perseverance

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

'Pursue pragmatism': Chofn partner on the importance of perseverance

Tingxi Huo final.jpg

Tingxi Huo joins our ‘Five minutes with’ series to discuss boosting the value of clients’ IP and the importance of reflection

Welcome to the latest instalment of Managing IP’s ‘Five minutes with’ series, where we learn more about IP practitioners on a personal and professional level.

This time, we meet Tingxi Huo, partner at Chofn International IP.

Someone asks you at a party what you do for a living. What do you say?

I help invention and brand owners protect their lawful rights and interests.

Talk us through a typical working day.

Open my laptop to see the newly received emails. Prioritise urgent matters, including, but not limited to, answers to inquiries, meeting/visiting clients, talking with colleagues about cases, coordinating resources to support clients’ cases, reviewing the work of the day and listing the work to do for tomorrow or days to come.

What are you working on at the moment?

Drafting training courses for junior attorneys and clients, writing and reviewing newsletters and articles.

Does one big piece of work usually take priority, or are you juggling multiple things?

I’m always juggling multiple things, typical for IP practitioners.

What is the most exciting aspect of your role, and what is the most stressful?

When our team solve the clients’ problems and is highly praised, I often find our work rewarding. In some cases, when we work very hard but still find it difficult to solve our clients’ problems, the stress begins to pile up, and I might become sleepless.

Tell us the key characteristics that make a successful IP lawyer/practitioner.

The perseverant pursuit of pragmatic solutions.

What is the most common misconception about IP?

It’s nothing but intangible assets.

What or who inspires you?

The clients’ heavy trust in our responsibility to solve their problems in prosecution and enforcement, and to turn their IP into real value.

If you weren’t in IP, what would you be doing?

I would be a writer to build the cross-cultural bridge.

Any advice you would give your younger self?

A) Study the relevant IP law well and quickly;

B) Work on actual cases as many as possible;

C) Regularly review and summarise my stronger points and weaker points;

D) Keep studying new laws and regulations; and

E) Learn from peers’ precedents and other countries’ good practices

What is your motto in life?

Study, and work hard and efficiently.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Junior lawyers aren’t unwilling to work hard, as some seniors believe; rather, they are rejecting traditional career advancement models that have limited payoff
Rebekah Gay discusses overcoming self-doubt, supporting the next generation of women lawyers, and how changing client demands are reshaping IP practice
New filing data suggests Germany's grip on UPC litigation remains strong, while Bardehle Pagenberg, Arnold Ruess, Hogan Lovells and Carpmaels notch up notable cases
In 27 years, KASS has expanded to seven countries in southeast Asia and is now eyeing further growth opportunities. Its CEO shares her perspective
Mine Güner discusses bridging law and business, taking the initiative, and why Taylor Swift helped put copyright on the map
Cindy Goh discusses why she launched Cheang & Ariff's IP department, the improving litigation environment in Malaysia and what to consider when using AI
Increased focus on adding patent litigation depth to the firm’s Dallas office was behind the boutique’s most recent hires
IPH's Canadian acquisitions are paying off on paper, but a couple of strong years may not be enough to show that the group's strategy has truly won over the market
Examiner statistics could help patent prosecution practitioners tailor strategies, turning an area of high variability into a potential competitive advantage
The England and Wales High Court’s ruling in Accord v Novartis may not rewrite the law on plausibility, but it does signal a pragmatic approach that could provide greater certainty for life sciences innovators
Gift this article