Patent Office views from Brazil, Europe and Japan

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Patent Office views from Brazil, Europe and Japan

This year's first AIPPI Congress lunch panel featured differing perspectives on “Continuous improvement of IP systems” from representatives from patent offices.

Pimentel_Luiz_otavio
Luiz Otávio Pimentel

Luiz Otávio Pimentel, President of Brazil’s National Institute of Industrial Property, Ministry of Development and Foreign Trade, went first and revealed a challenging situation for his office. The country has long suffered a large backlog of applications. The effort to improve this has become an even bigger challenge with Brazil’s economy falling into recession, with a contraction of 1.9% between April and June.

“In Brazil we are going through a large revamping of our public structure,” said Pimentel, speaking through a translator at the lunch. “Brazil is going through a difficult economic situation. That means a reduction in expenses for public institutions and that will include INPI too.”

Rather than the hoped-for increase in examiners to reduce the backlog, INPI must make do with what it has.

“The worst thing we face is a backlog,” he said. “There is a problem at the moment where we would need more people working for us but that is not going to happen. One challenge we have faced is the lack of qualified people. Also, our salaries are not as competitive as other institutions in public service. There is a need for remedies.”

Pimentel outlined a number of initiatives he is undertaking to tackle this problem. He expanded on these in an interview with Managing IP.

Kunihiko Shimano, Director-General of the Trial and Appeal Department in the Japan Patent Office (JPO), gave an update on his office’s activities.

One initiative it is undertaking is to implement three pillars of quality measurement: quality assurance, quality verification, and external evaluations. The Hague Agreement concerning international design registrations has been effective in Japan since May this year. Japan last year also amended its Trade Mark Act to protect non-traditional marks such as colours and sounds.

The JPO has also been collaborating with other offices. In May it signed a memorandum of cooperation with the USPTO to begin a bilateral Collaboration Search Pilot programme. This allows the two offices to share search information before a first office action.

Niclas Morey, Director of International Organisations, Trilateral and IP5 at the European Patent Office (EPO), gave the European perspective. He said there had been a small dip in in the rate of increase in European patent filing of 3.1% in 2014. “We are quite pleased about that,” he said, noting the 5%-6% increases in the years before that.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

In our latest podcast, Deborah Hampton talks through her hopes for the year, INTA’s patent focus, London 2026, and her love of music
Tech leads at three IP service groups discuss why firms need to move away from off-the-shelf AI products and adopt custom solutions
IP firms say they have been educating some clients on AI use, with ‘knowledge-sharing’ becoming more prevalent
As the US patent system tilts further toward favouring patent owners, firms with a strong patentee focus can get ahead of the game
Amanda Yang and Rachel Tan at Rouse and Landy Jiang at Lusheng Law Firm provide an overview of the draft amendments to China’s trademark law
News of EIP launching an AI platform and a trade secret blow for TCS in the US were also among the top talking points
The four-partner addition includes A&O Shearman’s former co-head of global IP litigation
A settlement involving Disney and another ruling concerning a lawyer’s request for access to documents were also among the big developments
Merchant & Gould's managing partner explains why the firm launched a Boston office and why it brought on board a local boutique
The model covers court-guided settlements, submissions-led determination of infringement and validity issues, and provides leeway for the court to determine a FRAND rate during negotiations
Gift this article