ARIPO opens for e-filing

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

ARIPO opens for e-filing

The African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO) has begun accepting online applications, making it easier for IP owners to protect their trademark rights in the Organization’s 19 member states. Among its members are Ghana, Kenya, Tanzania and Zimbabwe.

Fernando dos Santos, Director General of ARIPO, told the INTA Daily News yesterday that the Organization has updated its ICT facilities and has been able to accept e-filing since March this year. The move online has been accompanied by changes to make it easier for users to access the ARIPO database of patents, trademarks and industrial designs registered throughout its member states.

“The system will grow,” said dos Santos. “The idea is that soon we will have a regional database so that users can access the databases of member states. That depends on member states uploading their gazettes, but as of now applicants can read the ARIPO gazette online. Access is free for users.”

IP owners will not be able to file IP rights directly with ARIPO if they are based outside of one of the Organization’s member states, however. Instead, they will need to file them via a local agent. But dos Santos said that they will be able to send their applications in digital format to their local representative, who can then pass them onto ARIPO quickly and efficiently.

The number of trademark applications filed with ARIPO is slowly rising, but is still low compared with the number of applications received by other offices across the world.

“We could do better, but the problem is across the continent, not just with ARIPO,” said the Director General. He explained how the Organization is working hard to build the capacity of IP offices in its member states. It has programs to train examiners and judges, sometimes in partnership with IP offices such as the USPTO.

Dos Santos said that ARIPO representatives had recently met with politicians from across its member states, to impress upon them the importance of IP rights to economic development.

“Legislation is very important but there is a lack of awareness among legislators. That means that IP laws get stuck in parliaments. We want lawmakers to treat IP as a priority and update their laws. In particular, we want to see the domestication of international protocols and legal instruments and specific provisions that make it clear that a trademark or patent granted through ARIPO has the same value as those granted nationally.”

He added: “The continent is rising but to have a better future, more innovation and creativity, we need an improved IP system.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article