Russia: Chicago takes root in Russia

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Russia: Chicago takes root in Russia

An application for a trademark no 2016739384 was filed by Chicago, a Russian beauty parlour from S-Petersburg.

The patent office refused registration arguing that the claimed designation had a word element, Chicago, which is a geographical indication, the city of Chicago in the state of Illinois in the Midwestern region of the United States which may be understood as the place of manufacture of goods and services. This, however, is not true because the applicant is resident in S-Petersburg.

chicago.jpg

The applicant appealed the patent office's decision at the Chamber of Patent Disputes. The board of the chamber examined the appeal and noted that the word element Chicago was claimed as part of the claimed designation where the word combination beauty parlour is also present. Hence, consumers will perceive it as a beauty parlour in the first place. At the same time, the services rendered in beauty parlours are not services which depend on geographical location. Services which rely on geographical location cannot be rendered at a distance and therefore the claimed designation will not be of associative character in respect of those services.

The collegium of the Chamber of Patent Disputes noted that not every geographical name will be perceived by the consumer as an indication of the place where the manufacturer of goods (services) is located. Some geographical names are understood to be invented names and consequently may be registered as a trademark.

The claimed designation cannot be considered as pointing to a specific place of providing services or capable of confusing the consumer. Hence, the Chamber of Patent Disputes saw no reason to refuse registration of the trademark in Classes 35 and 44.

Nevertheless, the decision to register CHICAGO as part of the trademark raises questions. The law does not impose limitations on the creativity of people wishing to register a company name. Only the word Russia, Russian Federation and derivatives thereof must receive special permission. The names of foreign countries cannot be included either, but otherwise people's imaginations are allowed to roam freely. Chicago is famous for many things, but not for its hairstyles. There is no prohibition in the law regarding the registration of whatever comes to mind, but the name Chicago used in the name of the company inevitably creates associations with something that might be connected to Chicago. The owners went one step further and filed a trademark application for a trademark where the word Chicago stands out. The examiner at the patent office was wise to reject the application. The Chamber of Patent Disputes was less inquisitive. The owners of the company are not patriotic, at least in relation to their own city. O tempora! O mores!

biriulin.jpg

Vladimir Biriulin


Gorodissky & PartnersRussia 129010, MoscowB. Spasskaya Str25, stroenie 3Tel: +7 495 937 6116 / 6109Fax: +7 495 937 6104 / 6123pat@gorodissky.ru www.gorodissky.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Public figures are turning to trademark protection to combat the threat of AI deepfakes and are monetising their brand through licensing deals, a trend that law firms are keen to capitalise on
News of Avanci Video signing its first video licence and a win for patent innovators in Australia were also among the top talking points
Tom Melsheimer, part of a nine-partner team to join King & Spalding from Winston & Strawn, says the move reflects Texas’s appeal as a venue for high-stakes patent litigation
AI patents and dairy trademarks are at the centre of two judgments to be handed down next week
Jennifer Che explains how taking on the managing director role at her firm has offered a new perspective, and why Hong Kong is seeing a life sciences boom
AG Barr acquires drinks makers Fentimans and Frobishers, in deals worth more than £50m in total
Tarun Khurana at Khurana & Khurana says corporates must take the lead if patent filing activity is to truly translate into innovation
Michael Moore, head of legal at Glean AI, discusses how in-house IP teams can use AI while protecting enforceability
Counsel for SEP owners and implementers are keeping an eye on the case, which could help shape patent enforcement strategy for years to come
Jacob Schroeder explains how he and his team secured victory for Promptu in a long-running patent infringement battle with Comcast
Gift this article