Malawi: Malawi accedes to Madrid Protocol and prepares to implement new legislation

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Malawi: Malawi accedes to Madrid Protocol and prepares to implement new legislation

Malawi deposited its instrument of accession to the Madrid Protocol on September 25 2018, and the country will formally become a member of the international trade mark registration system on December 25 2018. Malawi has also posted the necessary declarations to make it clear that the refusal period will be 18 months, that mere intention to use is sufficient, and that the recording of licences in the international register has no effect in Malawi.

Malawi is a country that needs to specifically incorporate international treaties into national law before they become effective. There is no mention of the Madrid Protocol or International Registrations (IRs) in present trade mark legislation, the Trade Marks Act of 1958. There is, however, extensive reference to international trade mark issues – under the Madrid Protocol as well as the ARIPO trade mark system – in draft new trade mark legislation that was published a year ago. This draft legislation, the Trademarks Bill 2017, will replace the current legislation in its entirety.

We understand that the Trademarks Bill 2017 will come into force soon, but there is no definite date. Assuming that it becomes law on or before December 25 2018, all IRs designating Malawi should be valid and enforceable in Malawi. If there is a delay in the implementation of the new law, however, there might be a period during which it is risky to file IRs in Malawi. We will monitor the situation closely and report on developments.

In addition to making provision for IRs, the Trademarks Bill 2017 will modernise trade mark law in Malawi in a number of ways. For example, there will in future be a wider definition of the term trade mark, there will be scope for protecting service marks, there will be broader enforcement rights, there will be criminal offences for trade mark infringement, and there will be provision for actions based on unfair competition. We understand that initially the regulations that apply to the existing law will apply to the new law, but that, eventually, new regulations will be promulgated.

Wayne Meiring


Spoor & Fisher JerseyAfrica House, Castle StreetSt Helier, Jersey JE4 9TWChannel IslandsTel: +44 1534 838000

Fax: +44 1534 838001info@spoor.co.uk

www.spoor.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The initial contempt of court claim targeted Stobbs and the firm’s client for allegedly interfering with the administration of justice
Acquisition of platform developed by Boehmert & Boehmert lawyer set to create a combined platform for patent drafting and prosecution in Europe
Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Gift this article