Malawi: Malawi accedes to Madrid Protocol and prepares to implement new legislation

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Malawi: Malawi accedes to Madrid Protocol and prepares to implement new legislation

Malawi deposited its instrument of accession to the Madrid Protocol on September 25 2018, and the country will formally become a member of the international trade mark registration system on December 25 2018. Malawi has also posted the necessary declarations to make it clear that the refusal period will be 18 months, that mere intention to use is sufficient, and that the recording of licences in the international register has no effect in Malawi.

Malawi is a country that needs to specifically incorporate international treaties into national law before they become effective. There is no mention of the Madrid Protocol or International Registrations (IRs) in present trade mark legislation, the Trade Marks Act of 1958. There is, however, extensive reference to international trade mark issues – under the Madrid Protocol as well as the ARIPO trade mark system – in draft new trade mark legislation that was published a year ago. This draft legislation, the Trademarks Bill 2017, will replace the current legislation in its entirety.

We understand that the Trademarks Bill 2017 will come into force soon, but there is no definite date. Assuming that it becomes law on or before December 25 2018, all IRs designating Malawi should be valid and enforceable in Malawi. If there is a delay in the implementation of the new law, however, there might be a period during which it is risky to file IRs in Malawi. We will monitor the situation closely and report on developments.

In addition to making provision for IRs, the Trademarks Bill 2017 will modernise trade mark law in Malawi in a number of ways. For example, there will in future be a wider definition of the term trade mark, there will be scope for protecting service marks, there will be broader enforcement rights, there will be criminal offences for trade mark infringement, and there will be provision for actions based on unfair competition. We understand that initially the regulations that apply to the existing law will apply to the new law, but that, eventually, new regulations will be promulgated.

Wayne Meiring


Spoor & Fisher JerseyAfrica House, Castle StreetSt Helier, Jersey JE4 9TWChannel IslandsTel: +44 1534 838000

Fax: +44 1534 838001info@spoor.co.uk

www.spoor.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Six hires across the IP spectrum reflect Orrick’s efforts to better serve tech clients across the IP lifecycle
David Stone, partner at White & Case, argues that the government’s planned reforms will modernise and futureproof UK design law, but leave two of the thorniest problems unresolved
Max Scott will join the firm’s IP transactions group in California, becoming the latest Weil IP partner to secure their future
Yonatan Drori, attorney at Drori-Stav IP in Israel, explains why foreign counsel must treat Israel’s patent disclosure requirements as an ongoing obligation, rather than a one-off formality
From Japan to Southeast Asia, domestic and regional firms picked up some of the biggest prizes, while key foreign players maintained momentum
Earlier this month, Managing IP had exclusively reported that the French arm of Taylor Wessing was minded to pull out of the deal
Our latest podcast examines how Weil’s IP practice evolved, where its practitioners could (and will) go next, and which firms and markets stand to benefit from the redistribution of talent
Former Latham partner Chris Henry and transactions lawyer Liza Cotter are heading to the firm as Weil’s IP practice starts to disperse
Rival IP teams return to court for a closely watched appeal over AI and copyright, but observers hoping for answers to some of the technology’s biggest legal questions may be left disappointed
Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Gift this article