Admissibility of archived web pages

01 June 2010

With the vast advancement in information and computer technology, using information contained in web pages as evidence in patent invalidation proceedings is quite common nowadays. However, since information on the internet changes more frequently than information in conventional media, it is relatively difficult to preserve web page information or to use such information as legal evidence. Hence, archived web pages that are retrievable using the Wayback Machine, a service provided by the Internet Archive, a non-profit organisation, have become an important source of prior art data in patent invalidation proceedings.

Whether or not archived web pages retrieved using the Wayback Machine are admissible as evidence in patent invalidation proceedings in Taiwan is still unclear and this is now an issue being considered widely by the patent community. In a recent decision on patent invalidation, the Taiwan Intellectual Property Court did not admit a printout of an archived web page retrieved using the Wayback Machine as competent prior art reference. The IP Court reasoned that the content of the web page itself did not disclose the date of publication of the relevant information and that the retrieved web page merely bore a time stamp of the Internet Archive. The IP Court further commented that no relevant documentary evidence was additionally provided by the invalidation petitioner to prove the time the relevant information was published and that the relevant web page was no longer available when a search was conducted using the Wayback Machine during the appellate proceedings.

Viewed from another perspective, if the actual date of publication of the relevant information on an archived web page can be proven by other documentary evidence or the relevant web page is searchable using the Wayback Machine during the invalidation proceedings, it appears that a printout of an archived web page obtained through the Wayback Machine might be admissible as competent prior art disclosure. However, we will have to wait and see whether there will be future court decisions giving support to such presumption.

Nicole Huang

Saint Island International Patent & Law Offices
7th Floor, No.248, Section 3
Nanking East Road
Taipei 105-45
Taiwan, ROC
Tel: +886 2 2775 1823
Fax: +886 2 2731 6377
siiplo@mail.saint-island.com.tw
www.saint-island.com.tw


Bookmarks



INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements