Owner's consent needed to register patent licence

01 May 2010

The Federal Supreme Court recently decided on whether the Patent Office may rightfully register a patent licence solely on the request of the licensee. This was the practice of the Office in view of the fact that the Patent Act provides no specific rules as to who may apply for the registration of a licence and whether it is sufficient for proof of title to file the licence contract, or whether an explicit consent of the patent owner is needed; the Act also does not provide any rules on how the Registrar should act if it is contentious whether a licence contract is (still) valid or not.

The Court gave due consideration to the fact that the registration of a patent licence strengthens the legal position of the licensee because an assignee of the patent is obliged to tolerate continued use of the patent by the licensee according to the stipulations of the licence contract if the licence was registered. This, in the view of the Court, results in a burden for the owner of the patent since a sale of the patent may be made difficult in view of the licensee's right to continued use.

The Court therefore held that the consent of the patent owner is necessary for the registration of a patent licence with the Office on the request of the licensee and that the Office must involve the patent owner in the proceedings for registration, at least by informing the owner of the licensee's request to register the licence. If the owner contests the validity of the licence before the Office, the registration cannot be effected since it is not within the competence of the Registrar to decide on the validity of the licence contract. In this case, the licensee will need to file an action before the civil courts in order to obtain registration of the licence.

 
Brendan B Bolli and Rainer U Schalch

E Blum & Co AG
Vorderberg 11
CH-8044 Zurich, Switzerland
Tel: +41 43 222 56 00
Fax: +41 43 222 56 01
mail@eblum.ch
www.eblum.ch


Bookmarks



INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements