North America Awards 2010

01 May 2010

More than 140 guests attended dinner at the Four Seasons Georgetown in Washington DC last month for Managing IP’s third annual North America Awards Dinner

Lawyers from the leading firms in the US and Canada, as well as VIP guests from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the US Copyright Office, AIPLA and the USPTO attended the event.

More than 40 awards were presented to the leading firms in patent, trade mark and copyright work, as well as special awards for outstanding IP practitioner and lifetime and outstanding achievement.

Twenty awards were made to the leading regional firms of 2009 in the areas of patent prosecution and litigation, trade mark filing and contentious work and copyright work. Presentations were also made to the national award winners in the US and Canada for cases of the year in the area of trade marks, patents and copyright, and for work in life sciences, pharmaceutical litigation and disputes at the International Trade Commission.

Robert Stoll, USPTO commissioner for patents, presented achievement awards in recognition of...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements