OHIM’s plans to boost consistency

01 May 2010

Outgoing OHIM president Wubbo de Boer tells Emma Barraclough what the Office is doing to get better and faster, and the lessons it can offer other trade mark registries

Some trade mark applicants and their advisers have said that they would like to see more consistency in OHIM's decisions – both in examination and opposition procedures. What steps are you taking to address this?

Consistency is one of the standards we set ourselves in our Service Charter. We want to be fast and accessible and consistent. The Charter sets out what we understand by "consistency". We want our examiners to follow the manuals that we provide, and make decisions predictable for users.

We define an error rate of tolerance that we think is still acceptable and to establish whether we are reaching it we check a statistically relevant number of decisions ex post. That means that we don't influence the result. This is done every week by a group of experienced examiners. I think the results show that we are doing quite well when it comes to consistency of examination...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements