The USPTO: Using the Bar to set the bar

01 May 2010

USPTO Commissioner for Trademarks Lynne Beresford spoke with Eileen McDermott about the Office’s plans for improvement

Survey respondents were quite critical of the consistency of decisions among examiners – is that something the Office is working on?

The Office has been working on it for years. It's not easy – there are 376 different examining attorneys working on different matters in the Office. Last year, we implemented a consistency mailbox, but we've only had about 16 emails. We talked about it endlessly when we opened it – we spoke about it at the INTA Annual Meeting and in other speeches that we made, we sent an announcement out on our email listserve and published it on our website – but we feel like it's been a failure. Part of the reason is because applicants know that the Office can go one of two ways in making its decision, so there's a certain amount of reluctance there. Soon we'll be expanding it though.

What other efforts are underway to improve consistency? The...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements