The myth and reality of European trade mark harmonisation

01 May 2010

Is European trade mark law harmonised? A new database provides the answer

One-minute read

The Trade Marks Directive sought to harmonise laws in the EU. But to what extent has it been successful? Analysis of 200,000 decisions from 450 courts in 31 countries on the Darts-ip database reveals how practice has changed (or not) in different areas. Particular areas of interest are colour trade marks, unfair advantage, comparative advertising, distinctiveness and 3D marks. Managing IP invited lawyers from across Europe to analyse each of these areas, with a focus on the different approaches adopted by European countries, and whether they have adapted since the Directive was implemented. While change in some areas has been slow, harmonisation is coming, and in the meantime forum shopping remains important for trade mark enforcement in the EU.

A new case law database, Darts-ip, measures the extent to which protection is harmonised in areas of colour trade marks, unfair advantage, comparative advertising, distinctiveness and 3D marks....



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements