ACTA draft causes controversy

01 May 2010

Managing IP presents its guide to the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement

Peter Ollier, Hong Kong and Fionn O'Raghallaigh, London

Karel de Gucht

The European Commission and the US Trade Representative have released drafts of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement in an attempt to open up the negotiating process and ease concerns about possible restrictions on civil liberties and internet access.

"The negotiation draft shows that specific concerns, raised in particular by the civil society, are unfounded," said EU trade commissioner Karel de Gucht.

He added that no party in the ACTA talks is proposing that governments should introduce a compulsory three-strikes provision.

But the ACTA draft shows that the negotiators still have a long way to go before reaching agreement on key issues.

The consolidated draft contains many paragraphs littered with square brackets indicating that parties have put forward different versions and no agreement has been reached.

In a joint statement accompanying the release of the draft, the ACTA negotiators said that...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements