Trade mark firms of the year

01 March 2010

Managing IP presents the results of its annual trade mark survey, listing the leading firms in prosecution and contentious work in more than 70 jurisdictions

In this issue Managing IP reveals the results of part two of the world's most detailed and authoritative survey of the IP market. Following five months' research we list the leading firms in trade mark prosecution and contentious work in more than 70 jurisdictions.

Managing IP's exclusive survey of the world IP market, now in its 14th year of publication, provides a unique perspective on IP practice – based on hundreds of conversations with clients and practitioners worldwide. In the following pages, we reveal which firms are recommended, as well as which are rated in the top tier, covering both prosecution and contentious work.

Over the past five months, our team of 10 researchers based in London, New York and Hong Kong have spoken to hundreds of practitioners and in-house counsel to gather information about the trade mark market. Many more lawyers and attorneys have completed detailed questionnaires providing information...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements