Cut your copyright litigation costs

01 February 2010

A new trend in US copyright cases could save litigants thousands of dollars in discovery costs. Simon Frankel, Shannon Nestor and John Freed explain how

Most in-house counsel at content companies have had the following experience: a newly filed complaint arrives, asserting that someone wrote a brilliant work that was blatantly copied by the company. For example, the complaint alleges that the plaintiff wrote a treatment for a television show, sent it to the studio for consideration, and heard nothing. Then, two years later, the studio aired a show that was, the complaint says, just like the treatment, stealing its basic plot and characters and wilfully infringing the copyright. After reviewing the draft complaint, in-house counsel conducts a quick investigation and concludes that the plaintiff's treatment never got past an initial screening at the studio, so that no one at the studio involved with the show actually ever heard of or read the treatment. That means there was no copying, and therefore no copyright infringement. But the in-house counsel is only partly relieved, cogitating on...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements