Low-cost litigation to come to the UK

01 February 2010

London's Patents County Court is set to be transformed, following recommendations made in a wide-ranging review of litigation costs

James Nurton, London

London's Patents County Court (PCC) is set to be transformed, following recommendations made in a wide-ranging review of litigation costs published last month. If implemented, the changes could see the costs and risks of IP litigation slashed in low-value cases.

In his Review of Civil Litigation Costs, published on January 14, Lord Justice Jackson recommended that proposals put together by users of the PCC should be implemented. These proposals aim to increase access to justice for SMEs, following criticism that the UK does not offer low-cost court options like those available in some other European countries.

The main reforms are that parties in PCC cases will have to set out their cases at the outset, hearings would be limited and the trial would be restricted to one or two days. Recovery of costs would be governed by scale fees, and would be capped at £50,000 ($81,000) in...



Only subscribers have complete access to Managing IP Magazine, log in or subscribe now.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing IP Magazine (some articles and surveys may be excluded).

Subscribe Now

This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.

Subscribe

Take a free trial

Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.

Take a free trial


INTA Daily News 2012

Read this year's INTA Daily News - published daily by Managing IP direct from the 134th INTA Annual Meeting in Washington DC

null null null
null null

May 2012

Do you want to be famous?

Famous, well-known, notorious, reputed: everyone wants enhanced protection for their trade marks. But should they, and what does it mean if it is? Emma Barraclough explains



Most read articles

Poll

Will the new post grant and inter partes review proceedings result in more litigators practising pro hac vice before the USPTO?







Supplements