Goodlatte launches US Innovation Act

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Goodlatte launches US Innovation Act

The Innovation Act, introduced this week by House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte, represents an attempt to deal with litigation issues that were left out of 2011’s America Invents Act (AIA), USPTO Director of Governmental Affairs, Dana Colarulli said yesterday

Speaking to the AIPLA's Q Todd Dickinson during the opening plenary (below), Colarulli noted that many of the issues that were not included in the AIA remained of interest to many members of Congress. “That’s what this current bill tries to address,” he said, adding that “a broader audience” is now shaping the patent debate, including app developers and the retail industry.

screen20shot202013-10-2520at2010.png

Chairman Goodlatte’s bill, which comes after two discussion drafts were circulated earlier this year, seeks to tackle abusive patent litigation. It is the latest of several Congressional initiatives to address the issue, and may have the highest likelihood of being enacted.

The bill has bipartisan support, with 10 co-sponsors. Announcing it on Wednesday, Goodlatte said: “The bipartisan Innovation Act is designed to eliminate the abuses of our patent system, discourage frivolous patent litigation and keep US patent laws up to date. These important actions will help fuel the engine of American innovation and creativity, creating new jobs and growing our economy.”

Among other things, the bill would: 

  • require patentees to disclose more details at initial pleading; 

  • make fee shifting easier; 

  • increase transparency by requiring parties to reveal information on who has an interest in patents; 

  • limit discovery until after a claim construction ruling; and

  • provide for easier stays in customer suits. 

It also makes a number of changes to the AIA, including to the CBM review procedure – though does not go as far on this issue as some members of Congress would like.

A House Judiciary Committee hearing on the bill will take place on Tuesday and a bill in the Senate is also expected soon.

Colarulli said the legislation addresses four out of the seven legislative recommendations made by the White House in June this year and is “narrowly focused on cost concerns”. He added that the changes aim to promote consistency in the courts and increase transparency, including through better information on ownership at the USPTO and in courts.

Asked to predict what would happen, Colarulli said: “I think it will pass. The question is timing.” He added that the bipartisan support for patent litigation reform is key: “It’s one of the few issues where [bipartisan action] can happen in Congress."

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Earlier this month, Managing IP had exclusively reported that the French arm of Taylor Wessing was minded to pull out of the deal
Our latest podcast examines how Weil’s IP practice evolved, where its practitioners could (and will) go next, and which firms and markets stand to benefit from the redistribution of talent
Former Latham partner Chris Henry and transactions lawyer Liza Cotter are heading to the firm as Weil’s IP practice starts to disperse
Rival IP teams return to court for a closely watched appeal over AI and copyright, but observers hoping for answers to some of the technology’s biggest legal questions may be left disappointed
Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
Gift this article