Mystifying allegations in UDRP, says panellist
29 July 2010
Fionn O'Raghallaigh, London
A panellist has labelled a complainant’s allegation that the respondent had prior knowledge of mark "mystifying" in a UDRP decision
In a case decided on July 15, WIPO panellist W Scott Blackmer gave short shrift to complainant Juicy Details’ claim that the respondent, known as Another.com, should have been aware of its mark Juicy Details in view of the long period of time that complainant had already registered and used the brand name JUICE [sic] DETAILS.
The complainant, a Dutch company, was established...
Only subscribers have complete access to Managing Internet IP,
log in or
subscribe now.
Alternatively take a
free trial, giving you 48-hour access to Managing Internet IP (some articles and surveys may be excluded).
Subscribe Now
This article is available to subscribers. Please click subscribe to read the rest of the article.
Subscribe
Take a free trial
Please take a free 48-hour trial to gain limited access. Some articles and surveys may be excluded.
Take a free trial