Sponsored content

Andrew Diamond and Fabiola Rossy of Januar Jahja and Partners take a closer look at a recent court decision where an Indonesian theme park were ordered to remove an installation based on an iconic Los Angeles monument

Selin Sinem Erciyas and Zeynep Çağla Üstün of Gün and Partners discuss an important ruling where a discovery of evidence application played a significant role in fast-tracking a case

Khin Myo Myo Aye of Tilleke & Gibbins provides an update on Myanmar’s IP department during the ‘soft-opening’ period

Ranjan Narula and Mohandas Konnanath of RNA, Technology and IP Attorneys look at Britannia and ITC’s arguments in the case which alleges conscious copying

Ewan Grist of Bird & Bird considers the important questions that courts in both the EU and UK need to answer for their unregistered design regimes

Chi Lan Dang of Tilleke & Gibbins considers why a straw man is being commonly used and has become familiar to trademark practitioners in Vietnam

Armando Arenas of Olivares explores how Mexico has interpreted the experimental and academic use exception

Beau de Loménie explain the timelines set out in France for the release of court rulings to the public, although further patience is required in concern of first instance decisions

Matthew Costard of Spoor & Fisher explains why the Gambia’s ‘British law’ legacy is a cause of concern for ARIPO trademarks

Min Son of Hanol IP & Law explains how the recent Supreme Court en banc ruling changes precedents on infringement by the use of later-registered trademarks

Vladimir Biriulin of Gorodissky & Partners discusses a trademark dispute ruling by the Chamber of Patent Disputes, concerning amendments to invention applications

Eva Ehlich and Angela Zumstein of Maiwald explore why video conference technology at the EPO has caused widespread concern