Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 22,246 results that match your search.22,246 results
  • A recent High Court decision in Malaysia reconfirms the incorporation of the passing off concept in refusing a trade mark registration under Section 14(1)(a) of the Trademarks Act (TMA). Section 14(1)(a) provides that a mark or part of a mark shall not be registered as a trade mark if "the use of which is likely to deceive or cause confusion to the public or would be contrary to law".
  • A recent ruling of the General Court of the EU shed interesting light on the subject of genuine use of a Community trade mark (CTM). As to the aspect of the (geographical) extent of the use, the General Court appeared to apply a lower threshold than the Court of Justice of the EU suggested in its Leno Merken ruling from 2012. This should be good news for trade mark owners.
  • In Lupin Limited v Johnson and Johnson and Shakti Bhog Foods Limited v Parle Products Pvt Ltd, the Full Bench of the Bombay High Court, in a reference made to it on the question of law as to whether the court can go into the validity of the registered trade mark at an interlocutory stage in an infringement suit, has held that there is no bar to the jurisdiction and power of a civil court to consider the challenge to the validity of the trade mark at the interlocutory stage by way of prima facie findings.
  • Cross-border trade secret leakage has become common due to an expansion of international trade and exchange of human resources. The Supreme Court has clarified the criteria for recognising and executing a foreign judgment where a US company sought in the Japanese court the execution of a US judgment that ordered an injunction and damages on the ground of trade secret infringement under California law.
  • In recent New Zealand cases, there are interesting insights into protecting secondary marks, and how the courts respond when a mark has generally been used in conjunction with another mark.
  • Trade marks numbers 381529 and 281919 are for versions of a word trade mark Black Russian. An interested person filed an appeal against the registrations. The Patent Office accepted the appeal, stating that the disputed designation in regard to the goods cocktails in class 33 is of descriptive character and is a kind of goods because it reproduces the name of an alcoholic drink of a certain composition with a long history.
  • A dispute may arise if a distribution agreement does not include a clause relating to the disposition of inventory after termination of the agreement.
  • This is the second part of a two-part article introducing best practices in this sector. The first part focused on securing relevant IP. This part focuses on merchandise licensing arrangements.
  • The procedure of patent abandonment has been debated among IP attorneys, the Patent Office and the Ministry of Finance in the past few years.
  • Although second medical use patents are allowed and granted in Mexico, achieving the exclusive exploitation derived from this protection by the owner or licensee presents several challenges. As in other countries, there is legal uncertainty regarding how the owner can actually show infringement.