Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 22,295 results that match your search.22,295 results
  • Emma Barraclough, London
  • Peter Ollier, Hong Kong
  • Some of the world's biggest companies – including GE, Hewlett-Packard, IBM and Microsoft – have teamed up with the USPTO and New York Law School to launch a new system of peer review for software patents.
  • James Nurton, London and Shahnaz Mahmud, New York
  • Companies not domiciled in the United States that own US trade mark registrations often face difficulties in enforcing their US trade mark rights against the importation of grey market products bearing their registered US trade marks. Difficulties may be encountered because certain protection afforded to the trade mark owner under US law may only be available where the US trade mark registrations are owned by an entity existing under the laws of the United States.
  • In Romania, the legal provisions regarding the obligation to use a trade mark and the applicable sanction for failing to use it have been adopted relatively recently, through Law 84/1998 on trade marks and geographical indications. This provision gives two benefits: it allows the registration of new trade marks that are identical or similar to previous, non-used, ones and it incentivizes a trade mark owner to preserve his rights by using his mark.
  • In GlaxoSmithkline Philippines v Khalid Mehmood Malik and Muhammad Ateeque, decided by the Supreme Court on August 17 2006 (GR No 166924), the Court ruled that unless there is a clear showing of arbitrariness, "the determination of whether there is reasonable ground to believe that the accused is guilty of the offense charged and should be subjected to the expense, rigors and embarrassment of trial is an executive function exclusively of the prosecutor."
  • Unbeknown to many, the DVD logo pictured above belongs to the DVD Format/Logo Licensing Company of Japan (DVD FLLC). In the 1990s Hitachi, Philips, Matsushita, Mitsubishi, JVC, Pioneer, Sony, Thomson, Time Warner and Toshiba developed a standard media format with accompanying specifications. From this came the DVD logo and a set of rules for using it. Only authorized manufacturers may apply the corresponding logo to their goods.
  • According to Article 130 of Mexican Industrial Property Law, a trade mark must be in continuous and uninterrupted use for at least three consecutive years from the date when the registration is granted. If use of a mark does not commence within this period of time, the mark will become vulnerable to a cancellation action due to non-use which can be brought by any third party with a legal interest. This legal action is brought before the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI).