Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Search results for

There are 22,295 results that match your search.22,295 results
  • schouboe.jpg
    EPC 2000 changes explained
    On December 8 2006 the Administrative Council of the EPO took a further step in the implementation of EPC 2000, which will come into force this year. The Council reviewed and approved the Amendments to the Implementing Regulations to the EPC 2000.
    Managing IP Correspondent, February 01 2007
  • alge.jpg
    Biopatent Monitoring Committee delivers report
    The European Directive on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions 98/44/EC was transformed into national law on June 10 2005. The Austrian Parliament has established a special monitoring committee to manage this transformation. This committee (the Biopatent Monitoring Committee) had the task of monitoring the impact of this transformation into Austrian law on:
    Managing IP Correspondent, February 01 2007
  • tsanghoward.jpg
    China promotes local brands
    On January 8 2007, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce issued a measure which aims to strengthen the value of Chinese brands. By giving local brands a special status, and by promoting and protecting these brands, it hopes to boost the sale and export of local branded goods. As these gain popularity, it also hopes that the competitiveness of Chinese goods as a whole in the world market will increase.
    Managing IP Correspondent, February 01 2007
  • treloarpeter.jpg
    Courts get tough on hyperlinking
    Recently, the Full Federal Court prononunced on the operation of the Australian copyright provisions for websites that contain hyperlinks.
    Managing IP Correspondent, February 01 2007
  • Why Ethiopia is important for brand owners
    The draft legislation discussed in the MIP briefing on Ethiopia in May 2006 was promulgated on July 7 2006 under The Trade Mark Registration and Protection Proclamation 501/2006 (the Proclamation).
    Managing IP Correspondent, February 01 2007
  • Patent firms of the year
    This month MIP publishes part one of the world's most detailed and authoritative survey of the IP market. Following five months' research, in this issue we list the leading firms in patent prosecution and contentious work in 65 jurisdictions
    Managing IP Correspondent, February 01 2007
  • mip-banana-skin-puff.gif
    Turning commercial realities into fiction
    For brand managers looking to increase their product's profile and producers wanting to find new ways to finance movies and TV shows, product placement could be a win-win solution, says Brinsley Dresden, as he outlines negotiating tactics to help IP owners strike the deal they want
    Managing IP Correspondent, February 01 2007
  • Wide scope of indirect trade mark use
    The Municipal Court in Prague stated in Decision 9Ca 68/2003-36 that use of a trade mark includes not only direct use of a mark through placing on products or packaging, but also indirect use in connection with those products or services, for example on accompanying documents or advertising. In this decision the Municipal Court refused an action against the decision of the President of the Industrial Property Office concerning the cancellation of a trade mark due to non-use.
    Managing IP Correspondent, December 01 2006
  • tsanghoward.jpg
    China's database of well-known marks
    On November 12 2006, the Supreme People's Court of China issued a notice requesting all high courts to submit, for record purposes, all the decisions made by them or lower courts within their respective jurisdictions, in which trade marks have been recognized as well-known. It also requested that in future when the these courts deem a mark to be well-known, the decision be filed with the Supreme People's Court.
    Managing IP Correspondent, December 01 2006
  • treloarpeter.jpg
    Court ruling discourages medical research patents
    In Merck & Co Inc v Arrow Pharmaceuticals Limited [2006] FCAFC 91, the Full Federal Court considered Merck's patent for a particular treatment regime using bisphosphonates, which were previously known as inhibitors of bone resorption. Merck had found a particular treatment regime that had a markedly reduced probability of deleterious side effects.
    Managing IP Correspondent, December 01 2006
Previous
1
...
1921
1922
1923
1924
1925
...
2229
Next