Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 21,809 results that match your search.21,809 results
  • The boom in mergers, acquisition and private equity investment puts the onus on investors to carry out comprehensive IP due diligence. Tamsen Valoir provides a practical 10-point plan covering the most important questions to ask
  • Cambridge University Press has won two injunctions in New Delhi to stop the company's rights in its English language teaching material from being infringed
  • After the Thai public health ministry said it would issue a compulsory licence over a patent held by Merck, the Brazilian government has followed suit
  • Fees for filing Community trade marks are to be reduced for the second time in two years – but they will not be subject to a regular automatic review, as proposed by the European Commission
  • Under US trade mark law, the USPTO may invalidate a trade mark registration or refuse to register a trade mark application based on the premise that the underlying filing contains false statements. The risk of invoking this penalty typically arises when a trade mark owner signs the required declaration that the mark at issue is in use on or in connection with all of the goods and services listed in the application/registration when, in fact, the mark may be used on only some of the goods or for some of the services.
  • Patent cases often involve evidence that is considered confidential by either the patent owner or the accused infringer. For example, the evidence used to prove or disprove the quantum of damages adequate to compensate for any infringement is often confidential to the party that produced such evidence in discovery. During discovery, such information is typically protected from disclosure by a Protective Order.
  • To coordinate their actions in addressing the issue of CATV piracy in the Philippines, the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC), the government agency responsible for granting licences to install, operate and maintain radio/TV broadcast and CATV services, and the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IP Philippines) entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) on June 16 2006. On April 2 2007, the Implementing Rules of the Agreement were promulgated through the Joint NTC-IP Philippines Memorandum Circular No 1 Series of 2007.
  • In Retail Systems Technology Limited v P J Mcguire, Darragh Mcguire and Kelly and Mcguire Limited [2007] IEHC13 2 February 2007, the Irish High Court reconsidered the law in relation to the assessment of damages for copyright infringement and measured copyright damages by applying the same principles used for evaluating damages in patent infringement cases. This case concerned a claim by a technology company that its copyright in an electronic point of sale software product had been infringed by the defendants. Liability was conceded and the plaintiff elected an assessment of damages, which is governed by Section 128 of the Copyright and Related Rights Act 2000.
  • The Malaysian IP scene received a boost when the Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs Ministry unveiled plans to establish a specialized court exclusively for IP disputes. The motive was abundantly clear. There was a fundamental need for an avenue to concentrate on the escalating volume of IP issues, which were still pending at the Malaysian courts, resulting from a lack of expertise and complex procedures.
  • Interim injunctions are an effective way to protect IP rights in Turkey but they can be hard to get. By Okan Can of Deris Patents & Trademarks Agency A.S. and Deris Law Firm