Search results for

In Peru there are two regulations that forbid the registration of a trade mark when it infringes a copyright owned by a third party. One of these regulations is included in clause (g) of article 130 of the Legislative Decree 823 – Industrial Property Law, and the other is included in clause (f) of article 136 of Decision 486 – Common Regime regarding Industrial Property. These regulations state that the brand names consisting of a sign that may violate the IP rights or copyright of a third party or brand names that consist of titles of literary, artistic or scientific works that are the object of copyright protection may not be registered as trade marks.

Among non-registrable designations the Russian Trade Mark Law operative until January 1 2008 (and possibly the laws of the other countries) mentions the official names and images of exceptionally valuable cultural heritage objects of the Russian Federation. In this regard it is interesting to study a recent decision of the Chamber of Patent Disputes of the Russian PTO. The case concerns the cancellation of the Russian word trade mark Baikal, registration number 297,460. Baikal is a lake in Siberia characterized by exceptional natural properties. It is a unique ecological system and a UNESCO world natural heritage site. UNESCO has a catalogue of the World Cultural Heritage and also issued Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention.

At the ninth session of the Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore at WIPO in Geneva, the South African Minister for Science and Technology, Mosibudi Mangena, presented a working document on an Indigenous Knowledge Systems Policy for South Africa.

Trade mark use, according to Article 6 of the Trade Mark Act, means: "the use of a trade mark for marketing purposes upon goods, services or the relevant articles, or the use of a trade mark by means of two-dimensional graphics, digital audio and video, electronic media or any other media to an extent sufficient to enable the relevant consumers to recognize it as a trade mark."

The trade in counterfeits is on the increase and therefore causing problems for companies across industries. In order to stop the sale of counterfeits, companies are faced with the challenge of finding the most effective and cost-efficient measures to protect their products.

Let us assume a European patent is granted and validated in Germany. The European patent claims priority of an earlier filed German priority application. This priority application becomes a patent and is still alive when the German part of the European patent is validated.

The Trade Marks Act 1999, which came into force on September 15 2003, was India's successful attempt to harmonize its trade mark laws with the requirements of TRIPs, as it differentiates between well-known trade marks and trade marks generally. The 1999 Act deals extensively with the facts to be considered and methods to be adopted by the Registrar in protecting a well-known trade mark while considering an application for registration of an identical or similar mark in any class or classes of goods or services, whether the proprietor of such a well-known mark be an Indian or a foreign company, as well as at the same time protecting the interests of good faith proprietors. The courts in India, however, already afforded protection to such well-known trade marks against illegal copying, even before the introduction of the provisions in the Trade Marks Act 1999.

Canada has its own classification system for designs comprising 50 classes and 220 subclasses, compared to the Locarno System, which has 32 classes and 102 subclasses. The Design Office is studying the possibility of utilizing the Locarno classes together with more detailed subclasses from the Canadian classification system, thereby permitting Canada to harmonize with other IP offices.

Managing IP's third annual Awards Dinner was held at Claridge's in London last month, with more than 250 guests coming from as far away as Brazil, Korea, Australia, South Africa and Turkey

By virtue of a recent decision in the case No II GSK 305/06, the Supreme Administrative Court rejected an appeal filed by company T and maintained the Polish Patent Office's decision to invalidate the right holder's trade mark.