Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 21,826 results that match your search.21,826 results
  • In many inventions relating to telecommunications or computers, the underlying novel idea resides in the modification of a signal to achieve some useful purpose. An example can be found in US patent application 09/211,928, which relates to the introduction of watermarks into signals to help protect media against unauthorized copying. Consistent with the general desirability of protecting an invention in its most basic form without limitation to any specific apparatus or method of implementation, the applicants sought to protect their underlying invention in the form of a claim directed to a signal, wherein the body of the claim defined the novel and useful characteristics of the signal. The US Federal Circuit (In re Nuijten, 84 USPQ 2d 1495), with a dissenting opinion, held that such a claim was not a "process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter", as required by US law, and as such was non-statutory subject matter.
  • In the first decision, the Austrian Supreme Patent and Trade Mark Senate (ASPTS) has found that in a declaratory action concerning the non-infringement of a patent the existing right (patent) as defined in the register shall form the basis of the proceedings. Thus, only the subject matter in dispute shall be compared with the subject matter of the patent. However, the validity of the claims of the patent on which the action is based shall not be the object of these declaratory proceedings.
  • A monthly column devoted to IP curiosities and controversies, named in honour of John of Utynam - who received the world's first recorded patent in 1449
  • The Board of Appeal of the African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO) recently handed down a decision criticizing ARIPO's handling of a trade mark application (In the matter of Trade Mark Application No AP/M/2005/000303 Fones 4 U in the name of Langton Nyatsambo).
  • Recent case law has cast a wide net with the potential to catch patent owners making threats of patent infringement litigation in Australia.
  • Caroline de Mareüil-Villette of Cabinet Plasseraud outlines how to determine the value of intellectual property and explains why companies should do it
  • Lionel Vial, Béatrice Holtz and Alain Colombet of Lavoix outline the problems gene patenting is experiencing in French legislation
  • Magali Touroude of Cabinet Plasseraud reveals a revolution in French IP legislation
  • The French IP office has launched a range of activities to help SMEs protect and exploit their IP rights. Benoît Battistelli, director-general of INPI, explains more