Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 22,302 results that match your search.22,302 results
  • 2008 was an important year for China in many ways. But it also marked something of an awakening to the importance of intellectual property among the authorities and general public. Nongfan Zhu and Xiaohuan Qi of China Science Patent & Trademark Agent explain the most important developments
  • Administrative proceedings are one of three ways to enforce trade mark rights in Russia. Svetlana Vasilieva and Mikhail Stetsenko of PTG explain how recent developments have made them increasingly important
  • In accordance with Section 14 of the Thai Trade Mark Act, the registrar will require that similar trade marks filed by the same owner be registered as associated trade marks if they are deemed to be identical or similar to each other. Although applicants are entitled to appeal this decision, the Board of Trade Marks (Board) and the Intellectual Property & International Trade Court (IP&IT Court) are likely to uphold the association requirement, as it is a widely accepted practice within Thai law.
  • A myriad of laws and regulations exist that govern the way inventions should be managed and the rights of the inventors behind them. Bonan Lin, partner and attorney at law in the Beijing office of Zhongzi Law Office, explains them
  • The past 12 months have seen some crucial developments for IP owners in China. In June last year the government announced an outline of its long-awaited National IP Strategy. This provides a roadmap for how China plans to become one of the world's most innovative countries by 2020. Compiled after extensive negotiations between 33 departments or commissions of the State Council, it is an impressive statement of intent.
  • Rebekah Gay of Shelston IP Lawyers argues that the innovation patent system may not be achieving what its creators set out to do
  • A recent decision of the High Court of Australia has helped to clarify the scope of contributory patent infringement in Australia, say Robynne Sanders and J Roger Green of Watermark
  • Australia's courts provide an effective and efficient way for rights owners to enforce their rights. Jackie O'Brien and Anna Burkhardt of Allens Arthur Robinson outline the options