Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 22,213 results that match your search.22,213 results
  • Since Vietnam's entry to the WTO, member countries have grumbled about Vietnam's seemingly toothless enforcement of IP rights. In recent years, however, Vietnam has made a strong commitment to encouraging more foreign investment and protection of IP is at the foundation of this cause. A recent decision issued by the Copyright Office of Vietnam (COV) highlights the country's commitment to protecting IPRs and may offer some peace of mind to both foreign and domestic businesses.
  • When a party receives a notice letter from a trade mark owner making an allegation of trade mark infringement, one of the first steps that the party should take following receipt of the notice letter (after conferring with counsel) is to review any insurance policy which it may have to ascertain whether insurance coverage is available. Too often, parties simply assume that their insurance policy does not provide protection for claims of trade mark infringement and miss out on the benefits that they are paying their insurance companies to provide.
  • Greg Kalbaugh tells Peter Ollier about the work the US-India Business Council does to promote IP rights in India
  • Under section 30 of the Singapore Patents Act, an application may proceed to grant based on the grant of or final results of the search and examination of a corresponding application. As defined in section 2 of the Singapore Patents Act, a corresponding application is, inter alia, an application that is subject to a priority claim based on an application which is also the basis for a priority claim for the Singapore application.
  • The Romanian State Office for Inventions and Trademarks (SOIT) has rejected a national combined trade mark application Slims EA, filed for registration for products in class 34 "unprocessed, semi-processed or processed tobacco; tobacco products; cigarettes; cigars and cigarillos; cigarette filters/cigarettes; articles for smokers; matches/lighters and ashtrays for smokers that are not made of precious metals" due to the conflict with the previous national combined trademark Eve, registered for products in class 34 "tobacco, raw or manufactured including cigars, cigarettes, cigarillos, tobacco for roll your own cigarettes, pipe tobacco, chewing tobacco, snuff tobacco; tobacco substitutes (not for medical purposes); smokers' articles, including cigarette paper and tubes, cigarette filters, tobacco tins, cigarette cases and ashtrays not made of precious metals, their alloys or plated with such; pipes, pocket apparatus for rolling cigarettes, lighters; matches".
  • The Polish Patent Office refused to grant the protection of international registration to the trade mark Premium De-Luxe Nemiroff for alcoholic drinks, in particular vodka. The refusal was issued due to similarity to an earlier series of trade marks, Premium, owned by a well-known Polish spirits producer and destined to denominate vodka.
  • The Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPPhil) is inviting comments from the public on its proposed amendments to the rules and regulations governing the proceedings in administrative complaints for violation of intellectual property laws (infringement, unfair competition, etc), as well as other suggestions. The IPPhil's objective is to shorten the time it takes to issue decisions.
  • Norway’s new Trade Mark Act entered into force on July 1 2010. The new Act mainly represents a modernisation of the old Act and codification of existing case law, but nevertheless introduces a few practically important changes worth mention.
  • In a recent copyright infringement case (April 2010) in Malaysia [Suit No D5 (IP)-22-1152-2005], the local high court carefully reviewed certain key facts and legal precedents to meticulously analyse and rule on some important aspects of copyright infringement.
  • Dr Mohan Dewan and Ameet Deshpande of R K Dewan & Co consider jurisdiction in intellectual property law