Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 22,295 results that match your search.22,295 results
  • There is feverish activity at the Italian PTO, mostly for the concurrence of two new procedures, one referring to trade marks and the other to patents, which are being launched at the moment.
  • In May 2010, then deputy commissioner of Patents and Trademarks Noah Shalev Shlomovits ruled that the cigarette brand Eva, produced by Bulgarian manufacturer Aktsionerno Droujestvo Bulgartabac is not confusingly similar to the Eve brand of cigarettes produced by Philip Morris, allowing Eva to be registered as a trade mark.
  • Essentially, filing nullification of a trade mark registration can be performed by the registered owner of the mark or on the initiative of the Directorate General. However, a third party may also be able to file for the nullification of a trade mark in the form of a lawsuit filed at the Commercial Court. Under the provision of Indonesian Trademark Law that registered mark can be removed if it has not been used for three consecutive years in the trade, from the date of registration or of the last use, except if there are proper reasons for non-use that are acceptable.
  • Obtaining interim injunctions in patent infringement suits in India is considered a rather difficult feat. While this belief may be questionable anyway, in what may be a swooping contradiction to it, the Delhi High Court on September 16 2011 passed an ex parte injunction order in a patent infringement suit in favour of Vifor, a pharmaceutical company.
  • In a recent trade mark cancellation action procedure, the Trademarks Administrative Commission considered whether there is a likelihood of confusion between the following national trade mark in class 32
  • In two cases between Centrotherm and OHIM, the General Court had to assess revocation of a Community trade mark (CTM) based on lack of genuine use.
  • Further to a decision that ruled the proceeding of allocation of domain names to be against the Constitution of France, the allocation and management of domain names for extension .fr must comply with the law. Indeed, a new legal framework for French domain names has been established by Law 2011-302 of March 22 2011. The decree relating to the management of first level domain names (.fr/.re/.mq) was issued on August 3 2011.
  • The EPO has announced a change in its practice regarding the issuance of a second written opinion in the procedure under Chapter II PCT.
  • On September 1 2011, the Office of the Legislative Affairs of the State Council issued draft changes to the Trade Mark Law for comments. Several drafts had been circulated by the Chinese Trade Mark Office (CTMO) for comments some years ago, but that was followed by a long period of silence. The consultation period is rather short, only one month, and it ended on October 8 2011. The proposed key changes are the below.
  • Some of the more vinophile IP enthusiasts might have heard of young Austrian wine called Junker coming from southern Styria. In 1986 some wineries from Styria joined together to sell the young white wine under a common name and a joint advertising campaign. An advertising agency developed the label Styrian Junker. The marketing of the new wine was so successful, more and more Styrian wine growers were interested in collaborating. This led to the establishment of the plaintiff, a common marketing agency, whose statutes state that it aims to protect and promote Styrian wine. In 1996 the trade mark Steirischer Junker (Styrian Junker) for wines (class 33) was applied for and registered; in 2004 the same word mark was registered for foods (class 30) without filing a proof of the reputation of the mark.