Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 22,633 results that match your search.22,633 results
  • Cricket fans from around the world are about to feast themselves on the bowling and batting of their favourite teams as the 20th ICC Cricket World Cup 2015 takes place in Australia and New Zealand.
  • In the case of Ricardo Honrado v GMA Network Films, docketed as GR No 204702, the Supreme Court of the Philippines in its decision dated January 14 2015, showed the need for clearer language in drafting licensing agreements.
  • As reported in our article in July 2014, the interim decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) of April 25 2014 in case R 19/12 has highlighted a statutory imperfection of the patent system in Europe. More specifically, it follows from the decision that the judicial independence of the Boards of Appeal which follows from Article 23 EPC may not be reconcilable with the organisational ties of the vice president of the Boards of Appeal to the management of the EPO.
  • At last, the Trade Mark Act 2014 amendment, which will come into effect on April 1 2015, has introduced new kinds of trade marks such as colour marks and sound marks. In the United States, Christian Louboutin had filed a lawsuit against Yves Saint Laurent for an infringement of Louboutin's trade mark, consisting of a red, lacquered outsole on a high fashion woman's shoe. We may expect similar lawsuits in Japan in the near future.
  • Recently, the Mexican Trade Mark Office found that a Mexican company had infringed the image of a Mexican actor. However, the use was found in an advertisement for a hairstyling product in a store in Puerto Rico. The authority sustained that since the parties were both Mexican and the related product was made in and exported from Mexico, it has enough authority to sanction an infringement for the non-authorised use of the image for commercial purposes outside Mexico.
  • On January 9 2015, the Dutch first instance patent court found that a Dutch company had "offered" a product because a product brochure was accessible from its English language website. As a result, the company was found to have violated a preliminary injunction on offering the product for use in an infringing process.
  • In a decision of OHIM's Opposition Division on February 9 2015, in opposition case B 001934796 – Heineken Romania SA v Eckes – Granini Deutschland GmbH – the examiners found that there is a likelihood of confusion between trade marks having an identical first verbal element ("Golden").
  • The designation Terra Contes on application number 2012711660 with priority of April 4 2012 was filed in the name of a Russian company Trade House KODRU in respect of goods in class 33, alcoholic beverages.
  • The Supreme Court recently issued a judgment in a trade mark and company name infringement action where both parties were using and had registered trade marks and company names with the main distinctive element Arthur or Arthur's.
  • Where there are doubts as to the validity of a patent, a patent invalidation action may be filed with the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) to request revocation of the patent, or patent invalidity may be used as a defence in infringement litigation to assert non-infringement.