Firm
King & Spalding has now hired 15 partners from Winston Taylor and legacy firm Winston & Strawn in offices spanning Texas, San Francisco, and Chicago
Firm says its work with a biotech client could signal a sea change in how - and when - law firms enter the drug development process
In an exclusive interview, Bernard Ledeboer reveals how a Consolid-backed group of firms wants to expand across Europe, invest in AI and centralise operations to compete at the top tier
Laura Achával, founder of Achával IP in Argentina, shares how an evolving vision led her to launch her own practice
Sponsored
Sponsored
-
Sponsored by FB RiceDavid Herman of FB Rice explains what steps are involved in interpreting New Zealand’s Patents Act 2013 and summarises several significant rulings that have established precedents in patent law
-
Sponsored by Saint Island International Patent & Law OfficesSumin Lai of Saint Island International Patent & Law examines the IP and Commercial Court v ordinary courts to exercise jurisdiction over civil actions from IP rights in Taiwan
-
Sponsored by Bird & BirdRoman Brtka of Bird & Bird comments on the Ferrari Front Kit case and explains the practical consequences for manufacturers that want to protect a part of a product independently of the whole product
-
Sponsored by PurpleVine IPJoin Ude Lu, the chief IP counsel (US) of Purplevine IP, Helen Zhang, the litigation manager of Purplevine IP in Beijing, and Penny Sun, the brand protection manager of ABRO Industry, as they discuss evidence collection for patent enforcement in China and the US virtually with Managing IP on November 9 at 10am (US ET) / 3pm (UK) / 11pm (China)
-
Sponsored by OLIVARESJaime Rodríguez of Olivares explains the implications of the revocation by the Mexican Federal Court of Administrative Affairs of the criteria commonly used to allow complainants to credit their legal standing on trademark non-use cancellation proceedings
-
Sponsored by FB RiceStefania Sassnink and Paul Whenman of FB Rice provide a guide to when third parties can be held responsible for patent infringement on the basis of supplying a product