lead position
Sponsored content
Sponsored by
CAS
Join Managing IP and CAS on December 11 for a practical discussion on why critical references are still missed in intellectual property searches, and how strategic search design can reduce risk and improve outcomes
November 10, 2025
Features list
-
As the UK seeks to forge a new relationship with the EU, Andreas Sætre Hanssen of Onsagers explains how another non-member, Norway, has managed its IP regime -
Morten Garberg and Dirk Schüssler-Langeheine of Hoffmann Eitle outline how Europe’s IP regime may look after Brexit and explain what IP owners should be doing to prepare for it
-
The emergence of big domestic drug companies is reshaping Russia’s pharmaceutical patent landscape. Mikhail Khmara and Yana Lipatova of ARS-Patent explain how originator and generic companies can navigate the country’s changing IP rules
-
The UK referendum result means that London is unlikely to play host to a UPC central division court. Cristina Biggi of Bugnion makes the case for Milan taking on the role
-
Some IP owners doubt that software can be protected in Europe. David Robinson and Mike Williams of Marks & Clerk explain why they are wrong, and what owners of computer-implemented inventions can do to maximize their chances of securing a patent
-
Technological changes to the way that plants are developed and grown pose challenges to the way that plant breeders’ rights are protected. Ylva Skoglösa and Isabel Cantallops Fiol of Valea outline the problems and offer potential solutions
Local Insights
Sponsored by
Wanhuida Intellectual Property
Xiaoping Wu of Wanhuida Intellectual Property explains how the CNIPA’s recent invalidation of a sustained-release patent illustrates key considerations in assessing inventive step for pharmaceutical formulation patents
Sponsored by
Shiga International Patent Office
Masato Iida of Shiga International Patent Office says the decision by the Grand Panel of the Intellectual Property High Court provides a practical benchmark for calculating damages in cosmetic and medical patent infringement cases
Sponsored by
Berken IP
María Aurora García of Berken IP explains how Argentina’s evolving non-use cancellation system strengthens trademark integrity, streamlines registration, and promotes fairer market competition through efficient, partial, and administrative cancellation mechanisms
Sponsored by
Licks Attorneys
How UK extraterritorial decisions are undermining Brazilian judicial sovereignty and violating TRIPS
Senior patent attorneys at Licks Attorneys say recent UK court decisions on FRAND licensing conflict with Brazilian judicial sovereignty and the TRIPS framework governing the territorial independence of patents
Sponsored by
Gün and Partners
Selin Sinem Erciyas of Gün + Partners explores the growing alignment between Turkish courts and the Unified Patent Court in applying a strictly technical-functional standard for patent infringement by equivalence
Sponsored by
Liu, Shen & Associates
Wenjing Zhu of Liu, Shen & Associates explains how China’s administrative adjudication system is reshaping patent enforcement, offering faster, cost-effective, and technically expert resolutions for patentees, while preserving rights to pursue court remedies
Sponsored by
Wanhuida Intellectual Property
Minnan (Miranda) Xie of Wanhuida Intellectual Property analyses how China’s patent authorities and courts assess second medical use inventions, with key CNIPA decisions clarifying the treatment of dosage regimens and patient subgroups in novelty determinations
Sponsored by
Inventa
Vítor Palmela Fidalgo of Inventa examines how Portuguese case law diverges from EU rules on acquired distinctiveness, highlighting the Pão de Rio Maior decision and its implications for trademark interpretation and consumer protection
Sponsored by
Tilleke & Gibbins
Vietnam’s boom in AI-generated songs raises fundamental copyright questions, say Linh Duy Mai and Diep Thi Bich Le of T&G Law Firm LLC (TGVN), the local associate of Tilleke & Gibbins
Sponsored by
Hanol IP & Law
Min Son of Hanol IP & Law explains why the ruling by South Korea’s Intellectual Property High Court marks a key development in online patent enforcement